Gender and authorship in energy studies: Is there an impact?

Although gender inequality has been examined and debated as one of the most prominent challenges within the scientific community, relatively little attention has been paid to gender differences with regard to authorship. The aim of this paper is to identify whether gender differences exist with respect to the impact factors of the journals in which male and female authors publish their research. Existing studies use machine-assisted tools to determine author gender. Given the limitations of this type of approach to data collection and coding, we opted for a manual approach that ensured both the inclusion of a high number of journals and greater precision in determining author gender. This paper focuses on authors who published articles on a concrete area of research (energy) in a specific region (Central and Eastern Europe) over a 14-year period (2004–2017). Our study identified a gender bias within energy-related research: male authors (or male-dominated teams) publish more often and on average in journals with higher impact factors than female authors. • Article examines differences in authorship between male and female scholars. • We collected and coded data manually, overcoming limitations of similar studies. • There are more male authors who publish in journals with higher impact factor. • Type of methodology does not influence identified gender gap. • We did not find a clear gender bias in connection to field of study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Strategy Reviews
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101581
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender and authorship in energy studies: Is there an impact?

Péter Vakhal, Kateryna Yakovenko, Matúš Mišík, Veronika Oravcová et al.
Energy Strategy Reviews
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

Gender and authorship in energy studies: Is there an impact?

Péter Vakhal, Kateryna Yakovenko, Matúš Mišík, Veronika Oravcová, Raffaele Mattera
article en

Abstract

Although gender inequality has been examined and debated as one of the most prominent challenges within the scientific community, relatively little attention has been paid to gender differences with regard to authorship. The aim of this paper is to identify whether gender differences exist with respect to the impact factors of the journals in which male and female authors publish their research. Existing studies use machine-assisted tools to determine author gender. Given the limitations of this type of approach to data collection and coding, we opted for a manual approach that ensured both the inclusion of a high number of journals and greater precision in determining author gender. This paper focuses on authors who published articles on a concrete area of research (energy) in a specific region (Central and Eastern Europe) over a 14-year period (2004–2017). Our study identified a gender bias within energy-related research: male authors (or male-dominated teams) publish more often and on average in journals with higher impact factors than female authors. • Article examines differences in authorship between male and female scholars. • We collected and coded data manually, overcoming limitations of similar studies. • There are more male authors who publish in journals with higher impact factor. • Type of methodology does not influence identified gender gap. • We did not find a clear gender bias in connection to field of study.

Energy Strategy ReviewsVol. 56
Institute of Chemistry of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Institute of History of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Comenius University Bratislava (SK), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.