Behavior of Concrete Beam Encasing Castellated Steel Section with Different Opening Size

This research aims to investigate the behavior of castellated steel sections with varying hole sizes enclosed in a concrete beam. Should two different opening size types (depth 140mm and depth 280mm) be used? When we use two types of shear connectors with full and partial interaction, stud connections integrate the steel and concrete parts. This research demonstrates We examined five simply-supported composite beams under two-point loading conditions. We constructed four examples using castellated steel beams and produced one specimen using standard steel beams as a control. We examine the maximum load support capacity. Examined are the specimens of composite beams' deformations. Among the many characteristics assessed are the castellated beam size of the aperture and the whole and partial composite interactions. According to test results, the sample had a 140mm hexagonal hole. The sample experienced an increase in final load percentages of approximately 11.11%. Compared to the sample featuring a 280mm hexagonal opening size, the mid-deflection and horizontal displacement showed a significant increase. The figures indicate a final load of approximately 18.82% and 16.7%, respectively. Full interaction also revealed a higher ultimate load for the sample with the same aperture. When the sample was fitted with a 140mm hexagonal hole, the percentages increased by approximately 6%. Additionally, the percentage of deflection at midspan and the percentage of horizontal displacement decreased by approximately 16.7% and 26.8%, respectively, compared to the sample with a hexagonal opening size of 280 mm.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Al Rafidain Journal of Engineering Sciences
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61268/9h4xb807
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Behavior of Concrete Beam Encasing Castellated Steel Section with Different Opening Size

Al Rafidain Journal of Engineering Sciences
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Behavior of Concrete Beam Encasing Castellated Steel Section with Different Opening Size

article en

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the behavior of castellated steel sections with varying hole sizes enclosed in a concrete beam. Should two different opening size types (depth 140mm and depth 280mm) be used? When we use two types of shear connectors with full and partial interaction, stud connections integrate the steel and concrete parts. This research demonstrates We examined five simply-supported composite beams under two-point loading conditions. We constructed four examples using castellated steel beams and produced one specimen using standard steel beams as a control. We examine the maximum load support capacity. Examined are the specimens of composite beams' deformations. Among the many characteristics assessed are the castellated beam size of the aperture and the whole and partial composite interactions. According to test results, the sample had a 140mm hexagonal hole. The sample experienced an increase in final load percentages of approximately 11.11%. Compared to the sample featuring a 280mm hexagonal opening size, the mid-deflection and horizontal displacement showed a significant increase. The figures indicate a final load of approximately 18.82% and 16.7%, respectively. Full interaction also revealed a higher ultimate load for the sample with the same aperture. When the sample was fitted with a 140mm hexagonal hole, the percentages increased by approximately 6%. Additionally, the percentage of deflection at midspan and the percentage of horizontal displacement decreased by approximately 16.7% and 26.8%, respectively, compared to the sample with a hexagonal opening size of 280 mm.

Al Rafidain Journal of Engineering SciencesVol. 2(2)
Mustansiriyah University (IQ)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.