Do children with dysphagia and normal esophageal motility according to Chicago Classification always have “normal” esophageal motility?

First study ever to compare HREM parameters of children without dysphagia to children with dysphagia. Considerable proportion of children with dysphagia may be underdiagnosed according to the adult criteria. This emphasizes the need for universally accepted child-specific diagnostic protocols and norms.

Authors

B U.K. Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0355-3201)
Reza Shaker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6079-1017)
Karlo Kovačić (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1487-6591)
Mychoua Vang
Mark Kern (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0497-5967)
Joshua D. Noe

Institutions

Medical College of Wisconsin (US)

Publication Details

Journal: Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Published: 2024-11-11
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14963
Citations: 1
Primary Topic: Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 0.46

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

Do children with dysphagia and normal esophageal motility according to Chicago Classification always have “normal” esophageal motility?

B U.K. Li, Reza Shaker, Karlo Kovačić, Mychoua Vang et al.

Nov 11, 2024

1 citations

Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments

0.46

article

Do children with dysphagia and normal esophageal motility according to Chicago Classification always have “normal” esophageal motility?

B U.K. Li, Reza Shaker, Karlo Kovačić, Mychoua Vang, Mark Kern, Joshua D. Noe

November 11, 2024article en

1 citations

Abstract

First study ever to compare HREM parameters of children without dysphagia to children with dysphagia. Considerable proportion of children with dysphagia may be underdiagnosed according to the adult criteria. This emphasizes the need for universally accepted child-specific diagnostic protocols and norms.

Neurogastroenterology & MotilityVol. 37(1)

Medical College of Wisconsin (US)

Openalex Percentile: Top 31%

Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments

0.46

DOI Source OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.