Digitalization and Performance Management Systems: A Shipping Agency Case Study
This study examines how the digitalization of information processes embraced by shipping intermediaries (i.e. shipping agencies) within supply chain management (SCM) changes performance management systems (PMSs). This exploratory study uses the lens of stakeholder theory and adopts a case study methodology to investigate a shipping agency based in Italy. It uses primary data collected from semi-structured interviews and secondary data. The data were collected from No-vember 2022 to March 2023. The results indicate that the digitalization of infor-mation accounting processes has boosted the adoption of key performance indi-cators (KPIs) to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of opera-tional processes. The results also reveal that, in the agency relationship between agent and shipowner, the agent does not use the benefits of PMSs to identify stra-tegic KPIs for the business. This study highlights that when adopting PMSs in ship-ping agencies, it is necessary to include both an information accounting and an organizational dimension. Managers should be involved in training programs sup-porting a culture of sharing information through digitalized systems. The main lim-itation of this study, due to its exploratory nature, is the lack of analysis including the shipowner's perspective and the impossibility of generalizing based on the re-sults. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate digitaliza-tion, PMSs, and SCM in terms of the organizational-accounting frameworks of shipping agencies.
Authors
- Assunta Di Vaio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0498-1630)
- Luisa Varriale (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5267-6913)
- Luigi Lepore (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0088-6449)
- Luisa Mastellone
Publication Details
- Journal
- MANAGEMENT CONTROL
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3280/maco2024-002-s1009
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Maritime Ports and Logistics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.05