Green Finance Mechanisms for Sustainable Development: Evidence from Panel Data

The nexus between environmental degradation, green finance, and sustainable development has been analyzed in a number of studies. Despite attempts by different studies to fill the gap in the existing literature, they have all failed to do so. This study further extends the existing literature by applying robust techniques such as the system-GMM method and applying various proxies to measure green finance, which other studies have failed to examine. For this purpose, we employ panel data for the period of 1985–2021. Our findings support our hypothesis: while green funding tends to have a positive effect on sustainable development, environmental degradation has exactly the opposite effect. These findings are supported by a wide range of statistical methods, including the system-GMM technique. Our work underlines the major contribution bound to be made by green resources toward legislative frameworks in an attempt to aid the effort of reducing the negative impact of environmental degradation and building a sustainable development path.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229762
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Green Finance Mechanisms for Sustainable Development: Evidence from Panel Data

Salem Hamad Aldawsari, Bisharat Hussain Chang, Licong Xing
7 citations
Sustainability
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
7.90
article

Green Finance Mechanisms for Sustainable Development: Evidence from Panel Data

Salem Hamad Aldawsari, Bisharat Hussain Chang, Licong Xing
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The nexus between environmental degradation, green finance, and sustainable development has been analyzed in a number of studies. Despite attempts by different studies to fill the gap in the existing literature, they have all failed to do so. This study further extends the existing literature by applying robust techniques such as the system-GMM method and applying various proxies to measure green finance, which other studies have failed to examine. For this purpose, we employ panel data for the period of 1985–2021. Our findings support our hypothesis: while green funding tends to have a positive effect on sustainable development, environmental degradation has exactly the opposite effect. These findings are supported by a wide range of statistical methods, including the system-GMM technique. Our work underlines the major contribution bound to be made by green resources toward legislative frameworks in an attempt to aid the effort of reducing the negative impact of environmental degradation and building a sustainable development path.

SustainabilityVol. 16(22)
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA), Nanyang Normal University (CN), University of Business and Technology (SA), Sukkur IBA University (PK)
Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Nanyang Normal University
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
7.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.