Efficient Model Calibration Using Submodels

Abstract Groundwater models tend to become increasingly detailed to accommodate increasing data availability and higher accuracy demands from stakeholders. As runtimes increase almost quadratically with the number of model cells, this makes the models ever more computationally demanding. This high computational demand introduces challenges for the history‐matching (calibration) process as this is an algorithmic process that needs hundreds or thousands of model‐runs to obtain the model sensitivities needed to estimate parameters. Model runs may take hours or days to complete which in fact, is often a reason to discard the history‐matching all together. As a solution, we present a practical approach to use sub‐modeling in combination with parallelization for automatic history‐matching. Therefore a large model is subdivided into smaller models to carry out the sensitivity simulations. With a realistic case the method is elaborated, after which the method is demonstrated in the history‐matching of the transient Dutch National Groundwater Flow model. In this manner the model, which consisted of over 12 million model cells, could be optimized using 416 sub‐models and altogether 2,188 parameters in 1 week. This would take years to complete in a conventional way.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr036441
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficient Model Calibration Using Submodels

T. Kroon, Gijs Janssen, P. T. M. Vermeulen
1 citations
Water Resources Research
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
0.21
article

Efficient Model Calibration Using Submodels

T. Kroon, Gijs Janssen, P. T. M. Vermeulen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Groundwater models tend to become increasingly detailed to accommodate increasing data availability and higher accuracy demands from stakeholders. As runtimes increase almost quadratically with the number of model cells, this makes the models ever more computationally demanding. This high computational demand introduces challenges for the history‐matching (calibration) process as this is an algorithmic process that needs hundreds or thousands of model‐runs to obtain the model sensitivities needed to estimate parameters. Model runs may take hours or days to complete which in fact, is often a reason to discard the history‐matching all together. As a solution, we present a practical approach to use sub‐modeling in combination with parallelization for automatic history‐matching. Therefore a large model is subdivided into smaller models to carry out the sensitivity simulations. With a realistic case the method is elaborated, after which the method is demonstrated in the history‐matching of the transient Dutch National Groundwater Flow model. In this manner the model, which consisted of over 12 million model cells, could be optimized using 416 sub‐models and altogether 2,188 parameters in 1 week. This would take years to complete in a conventional way.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 60(11)
Deltares (NL)
Rijkswaterstaat
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.