BN SO44 - Is routine histological analysis of excised gallbladders necessary?

Abstract Background Gallbladder cancer is rare representing <1% of annual cancer diagnoses in the UK. It is more common in females (2.4/100,000 vs 1/100,000) with a peak age incidence of 85–89-years. Our trust routinely histologically analyses all resected gallbladders, over 1000 per year, regardless of indication. Our pathologists estimate that each specimen costs £75 to analyse, reflecting an annual cost of over £80,000. A 2021 systematic review suggested selective histological analysis is safe, reduces laboratory burden and costs. We aimed to assess our centre’s cholecystectomy specimens to ascertain the incidental gallbladder cancer diagnoses and explore the possibility of selective analysis. Method A retrospective search of our pathology database was carried out for the terms “cancer” and “gallbladder” from 2015 to 2018 inclusive. After exclusion of non-gallbladder primary cancers, all selected cases electronic notes were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was the incidental findings of gallbladder cancer. Secondary outcomes were the indications for surgery, intraoperative findings, histological macroscopic description, final diagnosis and further management where applicable. Results We identified 4421 gallbladder specimens of which 12 (0.27%) identified cancer. The ratio of female to male diagnoses was 5:1 and the median age was 73.5 years. Of the 12 cancers, 7 (0.16%) of these were incidental findings, with 5 having surgery for symptomatic gallstones and 2 for gallbladder polyps. The 5 symptomatic gallstones patients all had grossly abnormal macroscopic appearances of the serosa, dense adhesions or exudate; all were confirmed as gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Three patients were fit enough for limited liver resection. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that across four years the rate of incidental gallbladder adenocarcinoma diagnosed by cholecystectomy was 0.16%. In all non-polypoidal cases (0.11%), the gallbladder was macroscopically abnormal. This suggests that with careful criteria, selective gallbladder histological analysis may reduce laboratory burden and therefore costs associated with elective gallbladder surgery. With increasing emphasis to improve efficiency and rationalise healthcare spending, our results suggest that selective histological analysis may be safe and effective. However, given the consequences of missing a cancer diagnosis it would require a larger scale multi centre study to support a move in this direction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae271.215
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BN SO44 - Is routine histological analysis of excised gallbladders necessary?

Jeremy D. Hayden, Olorunda Rotimi, Alasdair Findlay, Lucy Belk
British journal of surgery
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

BN SO44 - Is routine histological analysis of excised gallbladders necessary?

Jeremy D. Hayden, Olorunda Rotimi, Alasdair Findlay, Lucy Belk
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Gallbladder cancer is rare representing <1% of annual cancer diagnoses in the UK. It is more common in females (2.4/100,000 vs 1/100,000) with a peak age incidence of 85–89-years. Our trust routinely histologically analyses all resected gallbladders, over 1000 per year, regardless of indication. Our pathologists estimate that each specimen costs £75 to analyse, reflecting an annual cost of over £80,000. A 2021 systematic review suggested selective histological analysis is safe, reduces laboratory burden and costs. We aimed to assess our centre’s cholecystectomy specimens to ascertain the incidental gallbladder cancer diagnoses and explore the possibility of selective analysis. Method A retrospective search of our pathology database was carried out for the terms “cancer” and “gallbladder” from 2015 to 2018 inclusive. After exclusion of non-gallbladder primary cancers, all selected cases electronic notes were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was the incidental findings of gallbladder cancer. Secondary outcomes were the indications for surgery, intraoperative findings, histological macroscopic description, final diagnosis and further management where applicable. Results We identified 4421 gallbladder specimens of which 12 (0.27%) identified cancer. The ratio of female to male diagnoses was 5:1 and the median age was 73.5 years. Of the 12 cancers, 7 (0.16%) of these were incidental findings, with 5 having surgery for symptomatic gallstones and 2 for gallbladder polyps. The 5 symptomatic gallstones patients all had grossly abnormal macroscopic appearances of the serosa, dense adhesions or exudate; all were confirmed as gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Three patients were fit enough for limited liver resection. Conclusion Our results demonstrate that across four years the rate of incidental gallbladder adenocarcinoma diagnosed by cholecystectomy was 0.16%. In all non-polypoidal cases (0.11%), the gallbladder was macroscopically abnormal. This suggests that with careful criteria, selective gallbladder histological analysis may reduce laboratory burden and therefore costs associated with elective gallbladder surgery. With increasing emphasis to improve efficiency and rationalise healthcare spending, our results suggest that selective histological analysis may be safe and effective. However, given the consequences of missing a cancer diagnosis it would require a larger scale multi centre study to support a move in this direction.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_9)
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.