OGC SO03 - Impact of recent European consensus guidelines on Oligometastic Disease (OMD) and potential case load of Oesophagogastric cancer resections

Abstract Background To evaluate the impact of recently devised oligometastatic disease (OMD) criteria as per the European consensus guidelines on the eligibility of Oesophagogastric (OG) cancer patients for curative treatment. Method A retrospective analysis was conducted on OG cancer cases discussed at multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings at a tertiary university hospital from January 2018 to December 2023. Inclusion criteria included T2-T4a adenocarcinomas, T2-T4b squamous cell carcinomas, small cell carcinoma and adeno-squamous carcinomas that were classified as M1 disease. Exclusion criteria were T4b adenocarcinomas, M1 peritoneal disease, non-adeno/ squamous carcinoma histology, M1 peritoneal cytology, and head and neck squamous cell carcinomas proximal to the thoracic inlet. Data on patient demographics, T stage, histology, and metastatic sites were analysed to identify those meeting the oligometastatic disease criteria. Results 483 of 696 were diagnosed as M1 disease. OMD was found in 59 cases (12.2%), with a median age of 72 years (43 males, 16 females). T stage distribution: 3 T2, 36 T3, 20 T4. Histology: 39 adenocarcinomas, 19 squamous cell carcinomas, 1 small cell carcinoma. Metastatic sites: non-regional lymph nodes (77.9%), liver (13.6%), lung (5.1%), bone (1.7%), adrenal (1.7%) Location of Lymph Node Involvement: 1Para-aortic11 (23.9%)2Right supra-clavicular7 (15.2%)3Porto-caval6 (13.0%)4Retro-crural5 (10.9%)5Upper mediastinal5 (10.9%)6Left Supraclavicular5 (10.9%)7Coeliac4 (8.6%)8SMA3 (6.6%) Conclusion Our data would suggest that 12.2% of patients discussed in the MDT may potentially be candidates for a curative intent treatment pathway. Although the long-term outcomes remain unclear, this approach may define a subgroup of patients who may benefit from curative intent treatment with the highest site being para-aortic nodes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae271.128
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OGC SO03 - Impact of recent European consensus guidelines on Oligometastic Disease (OMD) and potential case load of Oesophagogastric cancer resections

Parvesh Kumar, Loveena Sreedharan, Nicholas Penney, Sri Sivarajan et al.
British journal of surgery
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

OGC SO03 - Impact of recent European consensus guidelines on Oligometastic Disease (OMD) and potential case load of Oesophagogastric cancer resections

Parvesh Kumar, Loveena Sreedharan, Nicholas Penney, Sri Sivarajan, Michael Lewis, Sachin Shenoy, Martha Gissmondi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background To evaluate the impact of recently devised oligometastatic disease (OMD) criteria as per the European consensus guidelines on the eligibility of Oesophagogastric (OG) cancer patients for curative treatment. Method A retrospective analysis was conducted on OG cancer cases discussed at multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings at a tertiary university hospital from January 2018 to December 2023. Inclusion criteria included T2-T4a adenocarcinomas, T2-T4b squamous cell carcinomas, small cell carcinoma and adeno-squamous carcinomas that were classified as M1 disease. Exclusion criteria were T4b adenocarcinomas, M1 peritoneal disease, non-adeno/ squamous carcinoma histology, M1 peritoneal cytology, and head and neck squamous cell carcinomas proximal to the thoracic inlet. Data on patient demographics, T stage, histology, and metastatic sites were analysed to identify those meeting the oligometastatic disease criteria. Results 483 of 696 were diagnosed as M1 disease. OMD was found in 59 cases (12.2%), with a median age of 72 years (43 males, 16 females). T stage distribution: 3 T2, 36 T3, 20 T4. Histology: 39 adenocarcinomas, 19 squamous cell carcinomas, 1 small cell carcinoma. Metastatic sites: non-regional lymph nodes (77.9%), liver (13.6%), lung (5.1%), bone (1.7%), adrenal (1.7%) Location of Lymph Node Involvement: 1Para-aortic11 (23.9%)2Right supra-clavicular7 (15.2%)3Porto-caval6 (13.0%)4Retro-crural5 (10.9%)5Upper mediastinal5 (10.9%)6Left Supraclavicular5 (10.9%)7Coeliac4 (8.6%)8SMA3 (6.6%) Conclusion Our data would suggest that 12.2% of patients discussed in the MDT may potentially be candidates for a curative intent treatment pathway. Although the long-term outcomes remain unclear, this approach may define a subgroup of patients who may benefit from curative intent treatment with the highest site being para-aortic nodes.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_9)
University of East Anglia (GB), Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.