MS O11 - HPB Laparoscopic vs open liver resections for hepatocellular cancer in a tertiary care hepatobiliary unit; outcomes of cases over 10 years

Abstract Background Despite its established role in liver resection surgery, minimally invasive surgery is still not a favoured option in cases of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) due to perceived risks of intra- and post-operative surgical morbidity and poorer oncological outcomes. This study aims to look at the outcomes of liver resections performed for HCC cases over ten years comparing laparoscopic and open cohorts. Method A retrospective study including all liver resections for HCC cases performed in our tertiary care hepatobiliary unit between 2013 and 2022 (10 years) was conducted. Data on demographics, underlying degree of liver cirrhosis, types of liver resection and post-operative outcomes, including recurrence rates and resections margins were collected and reported using descriptive statistics. Survival analysis was performed with compared between these two groups with log rank test in GraphPad prism 10. Results 200 liver resections performed for HCC were grouped into laparoscopic and open cohorts containing 147 and 53 patients respectively. 21 (40%) laparoscopic cases had background liver cirrhosis as compared to 24 (16%) in open cases. Major liver resection comprised 9% and 43% of all cases and one and five patients had Grade B/C PHLF in laparoscopic and open groups. All 8 (4%) cases with 90-day mortality were from the open group. Negative resection margins (68% vs 71%), local recurrence (51% vs 47%) and overall survival (75 months vs 67 months (p=0.29)) were similar in laparoscopic and open groups, respectively. Conclusion Post-operative and oncological outcomes of liver resections for HCC were comparable in laparoscopic and open groups. Laparoscopic liver resections could be safely performed in patients with background liver cirrhosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae271.042
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MS O11 - HPB Laparoscopic vs open liver resections for hepatocellular cancer in a tertiary care hepatobiliary unit; outcomes of cases over 10 years

Keith Roberts, Syed Soulat Raza, Saad Rehman, N. Chatzizacharias et al.
British journal of surgery
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

MS O11 - HPB Laparoscopic vs open liver resections for hepatocellular cancer in a tertiary care hepatobiliary unit; outcomes of cases over 10 years

Keith Roberts, Syed Soulat Raza, Saad Rehman, N. Chatzizacharias, David B. Bartlett, Shishir Shetty, Robert P. Sutcliffe, B. Dasari, Ravi Marudanayagam, Tahir Shah, Sam Sherratt-Mayhew, C. Max Page, Michail Papamichail
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite its established role in liver resection surgery, minimally invasive surgery is still not a favoured option in cases of hepatocellular cancer (HCC) due to perceived risks of intra- and post-operative surgical morbidity and poorer oncological outcomes. This study aims to look at the outcomes of liver resections performed for HCC cases over ten years comparing laparoscopic and open cohorts. Method A retrospective study including all liver resections for HCC cases performed in our tertiary care hepatobiliary unit between 2013 and 2022 (10 years) was conducted. Data on demographics, underlying degree of liver cirrhosis, types of liver resection and post-operative outcomes, including recurrence rates and resections margins were collected and reported using descriptive statistics. Survival analysis was performed with compared between these two groups with log rank test in GraphPad prism 10. Results 200 liver resections performed for HCC were grouped into laparoscopic and open cohorts containing 147 and 53 patients respectively. 21 (40%) laparoscopic cases had background liver cirrhosis as compared to 24 (16%) in open cases. Major liver resection comprised 9% and 43% of all cases and one and five patients had Grade B/C PHLF in laparoscopic and open groups. All 8 (4%) cases with 90-day mortality were from the open group. Negative resection margins (68% vs 71%), local recurrence (51% vs 47%) and overall survival (75 months vs 67 months (p=0.29)) were similar in laparoscopic and open groups, respectively. Conclusion Post-operative and oncological outcomes of liver resections for HCC were comparable in laparoscopic and open groups. Laparoscopic liver resections could be safely performed in patients with background liver cirrhosis.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_9)
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB), Institute of Immunology (HR), Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.