HPB SO36 - Diagnostic Accuracy in Detecting Gall Bladder Polyps: A Retrospective Study

Abstract Background Gallbladder polyps are outgrowths of the gallbladder mucosal wall. They are usually found incidentally on ultrasonography or after cholecystectomy, but can lead to symptoms similar to those caused by gallbladder stones1. It is important to differentiate pseudo-polyps (cholesterol, adenomyomatosis, inflammatory, hyperplastic) from true-polyps (adenomas, adenocarcinomas2,3). The vast majority of polyps detected by ultrasound are pseudo-polyps, with no risk of malignancy. Ultrasound has been considered the gold standard for diagnosis,. However, it is limited by several factors4,5. The primary objective of this study is to assess the accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosing true polyps in patients undergoing surgery for this condition. Method Retrospective review carried out on all US scans reporting Gallbladder polyps for patients who underwent cholecystectomy, with additional data from MRI and CT scans. Sample size 44 patients Time period: From 2019 to present. Analysis was done on Excel Inclusion Criteria: Patients who had cholecystectomies with USS results confirming GB polyps, and have histology reports.Patients who had cholecystectomies with USS results confirming GB stones, and polyps as a co-existing pathology, and have histology reports. Results We included 44 patients our study, all had polyps on USS, and elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the mean age was 52 Years, and 63.6 % were women. Out of 44 USS patients, 24 (54.5%) showed features of polyps on histopathology. However, only 6 (13.6%) specimens were identified as adenomas. 18 USS showed polyps measuring 10mm or more. The majority (55.6%) were benign pathologies (pseudo-polyps). Interestingly, only 3 showed features of adenomas (16.7%). 22 Patients had multiple USS for surveillance, Histology showed polyps in 12 specimens (54.5%), out of which only 4 were adenomas (18.2%). Conclusion The accuracy of transabdominal ultrasound in diagnosing true polyps is limited. However, the sensitivity to distinguish adenomas slightly increases in larger polyps This low diagnostic accuracy underscores the need for caution among surgeons when making clinical decisions based on ultrasound-detected polyps. The high false positive rate suggests that more diagnostic criteria are necessary to improve the reliability of ultrasound in the diagnosis and screening of polyps, which is crucial to help reduce unnecessary procedures in asymptomatic patients who had negative histology reports postoperatively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae271.269
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HPB SO36 - Diagnostic Accuracy in Detecting Gall Bladder Polyps: A Retrospective Study

B. Ivanov, Mohamed Shaaban, Oluwakorede Sanyaolu, Lamis Abdelkarim
British journal of surgery
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

HPB SO36 - Diagnostic Accuracy in Detecting Gall Bladder Polyps: A Retrospective Study

B. Ivanov, Mohamed Shaaban, Oluwakorede Sanyaolu, Lamis Abdelkarim
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Gallbladder polyps are outgrowths of the gallbladder mucosal wall. They are usually found incidentally on ultrasonography or after cholecystectomy, but can lead to symptoms similar to those caused by gallbladder stones1. It is important to differentiate pseudo-polyps (cholesterol, adenomyomatosis, inflammatory, hyperplastic) from true-polyps (adenomas, adenocarcinomas2,3). The vast majority of polyps detected by ultrasound are pseudo-polyps, with no risk of malignancy. Ultrasound has been considered the gold standard for diagnosis,. However, it is limited by several factors4,5. The primary objective of this study is to assess the accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosing true polyps in patients undergoing surgery for this condition. Method Retrospective review carried out on all US scans reporting Gallbladder polyps for patients who underwent cholecystectomy, with additional data from MRI and CT scans. Sample size 44 patients Time period: From 2019 to present. Analysis was done on Excel Inclusion Criteria: Patients who had cholecystectomies with USS results confirming GB polyps, and have histology reports.Patients who had cholecystectomies with USS results confirming GB stones, and polyps as a co-existing pathology, and have histology reports. Results We included 44 patients our study, all had polyps on USS, and elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the mean age was 52 Years, and 63.6 % were women. Out of 44 USS patients, 24 (54.5%) showed features of polyps on histopathology. However, only 6 (13.6%) specimens were identified as adenomas. 18 USS showed polyps measuring 10mm or more. The majority (55.6%) were benign pathologies (pseudo-polyps). Interestingly, only 3 showed features of adenomas (16.7%). 22 Patients had multiple USS for surveillance, Histology showed polyps in 12 specimens (54.5%), out of which only 4 were adenomas (18.2%). Conclusion The accuracy of transabdominal ultrasound in diagnosing true polyps is limited. However, the sensitivity to distinguish adenomas slightly increases in larger polyps This low diagnostic accuracy underscores the need for caution among surgeons when making clinical decisions based on ultrasound-detected polyps. The high false positive rate suggests that more diagnostic criteria are necessary to improve the reliability of ultrasound in the diagnosis and screening of polyps, which is crucial to help reduce unnecessary procedures in asymptomatic patients who had negative histology reports postoperatively.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_9)
Princess Alexandra Hospital (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.