OGC SO12 - Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Postoperative Oesophagogastric Cancer Patients: A Completed Audit

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a life-threatening complication for cancer patients undergoing oesophagogastric surgery. The NICE recommends extending pharmacological VTE prophylaxis to 28 days for patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. While the effectiveness of in-hospital VTE prophylaxis is well-documented, the optimal duration for postoperative VTE prophylaxis remains a subject of debate. This study aims to evaluate the prescribing compliance, effectiveness, and safety of extending VTE prophylaxis to 28 days following hospital discharge (HD), a policy adopted trust-wide since 2014. Method This is an 11-year retrospective study from July 2012-2022, followed by a complete audit cycle conducted between January 2023-2024. The study included all patients who underwent cardio-esophagectomy or gastrectomy for oesophagogastric cancers. Exclusion criteria comprised patients who died during the index admission, those who underwent benign oesophagogastric surgery or local excision of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), and patients with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line-associated VTE. The primary outcome measured was the prescribing compliance of 28-day VTE prophylaxis post-hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of VTE and bleeding complications necessitating hospital readmission within 28 days of discharge. Results Our study included 582 patients, showing that post-2014, 423 out of 490 patients (86.3%) were discharged with 28-day VTE prophylaxis, compared to 13 out of 92 patients (14.1%) pre-2014, indicating a significant improvement (p<0.05). Only one patient (0.17%) developed VTE more than 28 days post-discharge, and no readmissions due to bleeding complications. In the subsequent audit, 63 out of 68 patients (92.6%) received the prophylaxis, further increasing prescribing compliance. Comparing the two periods, compliance improved from 86.3% to 92.6%, though not statistically significant (p=0.145). Overall, VTE incidence was minimised from 0.17% to 0%, with no readmissions due to bleeding complications. Conclusion Routine extended VTE prophylaxis for 28 days post-hospital discharge should be recommended for cancer patients undergoing oesophagogastric surgery. This practice has significantly improved prescribing compliance rates, reduced post-hospital discharge VTE incidence, and demonstrated safety, with no hospital readmissions due to bleeding complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae271.137
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OGC SO12 - Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Postoperative Oesophagogastric Cancer Patients: A Completed Audit

Jen Yee Kuan, Jeremy Ward, Paul Turner, Vinutha Shetty et al.
British journal of surgery
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

OGC SO12 - Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Postoperative Oesophagogastric Cancer Patients: A Completed Audit

Jen Yee Kuan, Jeremy Ward, Paul Turner, Vinutha Shetty, Kishore Pursnani
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a life-threatening complication for cancer patients undergoing oesophagogastric surgery. The NICE recommends extending pharmacological VTE prophylaxis to 28 days for patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. While the effectiveness of in-hospital VTE prophylaxis is well-documented, the optimal duration for postoperative VTE prophylaxis remains a subject of debate. This study aims to evaluate the prescribing compliance, effectiveness, and safety of extending VTE prophylaxis to 28 days following hospital discharge (HD), a policy adopted trust-wide since 2014. Method This is an 11-year retrospective study from July 2012-2022, followed by a complete audit cycle conducted between January 2023-2024. The study included all patients who underwent cardio-esophagectomy or gastrectomy for oesophagogastric cancers. Exclusion criteria comprised patients who died during the index admission, those who underwent benign oesophagogastric surgery or local excision of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), and patients with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line-associated VTE. The primary outcome measured was the prescribing compliance of 28-day VTE prophylaxis post-hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of VTE and bleeding complications necessitating hospital readmission within 28 days of discharge. Results Our study included 582 patients, showing that post-2014, 423 out of 490 patients (86.3%) were discharged with 28-day VTE prophylaxis, compared to 13 out of 92 patients (14.1%) pre-2014, indicating a significant improvement (p<0.05). Only one patient (0.17%) developed VTE more than 28 days post-discharge, and no readmissions due to bleeding complications. In the subsequent audit, 63 out of 68 patients (92.6%) received the prophylaxis, further increasing prescribing compliance. Comparing the two periods, compliance improved from 86.3% to 92.6%, though not statistically significant (p=0.145). Overall, VTE incidence was minimised from 0.17% to 0%, with no readmissions due to bleeding complications. Conclusion Routine extended VTE prophylaxis for 28 days post-hospital discharge should be recommended for cancer patients undergoing oesophagogastric surgery. This practice has significantly improved prescribing compliance rates, reduced post-hospital discharge VTE incidence, and demonstrated safety, with no hospital readmissions due to bleeding complications.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_9)
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.