BN SO58 - Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Hiatal Surgery: A Feasibility Study

Abstract Background Hiatal surgery is predominantly a quality-of-life procedure rather than a lifesaving intervention. Whilst procedural complications are well understood, they do not necessarily reflect the patient experience. Traditional indicators of patient care are insufficient. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) are robust indicators of care quality (1) and are being used across surgical specialities to benchmark success and identify areas for improvement (2). We present a three-year review of our PROM data to demonstrate feasibility of data collection. Method Patient reported outcome measure data were collected from the National Hiatal Surgery Registry (3) for our benign centre over a three-year period (November 2021-January 2024). Consent was obtained from all patients for research purposes. Surgical procedures included: anti-reflux surgery, hiatus hernia repair and cardiomyotomy. All patients were asked to complete pre-operative quality of life surveys. Patients are automatically contacted through the registry at 6months, 1 year and then annually for five years and prompted to complete quality of life surveys. Ekhardt score is used in achalasia. GORD-QoL score was used for anti-reflux procedures, with the Hernia-QoL score for hiatal hernia. Results Data were collected for 20 patients. Mean BMI was 28.2. All completed preoperative surveys. At six months there was attrition of one patient, who has since completed 1-year and 2-year data. At the time of writing, six patients have completed 6month data, 5 patients have completed 1-year data and 3 patients have completed 2-year data. Mean Ekhardt score was 9.25 preoperatively; at six months mean score was 0. Five patients underwent LINX, eleven underwent fundoplication; one Dor, ten Toupet. Mean pre-operative quality of life score was 31.1; at six months mean score was 15.5. At one year this was 4. Conclusion The National Hiatal Surgery Registry facilitates easy acquisition of surgeon specific PROM data over a short- and long-term period. Patient attrition is low, demonstrating acceptability. Our data demonstrate significantly improved patient reported quality of life postoperatively for all hiatal surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae271.229
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BN SO58 - Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Hiatal Surgery: A Feasibility Study

Petros Christopoulos, Kirk Bowling, Timothy Platt, Stuart Andrews et al.
British journal of surgery
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

BN SO58 - Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Hiatal Surgery: A Feasibility Study

Petros Christopoulos, Kirk Bowling, Timothy Platt, Stuart Andrews, Surajit Sinha, Heather Davis, Marcos Kostalas, R. C. Atkins
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Hiatal surgery is predominantly a quality-of-life procedure rather than a lifesaving intervention. Whilst procedural complications are well understood, they do not necessarily reflect the patient experience. Traditional indicators of patient care are insufficient. Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) are robust indicators of care quality (1) and are being used across surgical specialities to benchmark success and identify areas for improvement (2). We present a three-year review of our PROM data to demonstrate feasibility of data collection. Method Patient reported outcome measure data were collected from the National Hiatal Surgery Registry (3) for our benign centre over a three-year period (November 2021-January 2024). Consent was obtained from all patients for research purposes. Surgical procedures included: anti-reflux surgery, hiatus hernia repair and cardiomyotomy. All patients were asked to complete pre-operative quality of life surveys. Patients are automatically contacted through the registry at 6months, 1 year and then annually for five years and prompted to complete quality of life surveys. Ekhardt score is used in achalasia. GORD-QoL score was used for anti-reflux procedures, with the Hernia-QoL score for hiatal hernia. Results Data were collected for 20 patients. Mean BMI was 28.2. All completed preoperative surveys. At six months there was attrition of one patient, who has since completed 1-year and 2-year data. At the time of writing, six patients have completed 6month data, 5 patients have completed 1-year data and 3 patients have completed 2-year data. Mean Ekhardt score was 9.25 preoperatively; at six months mean score was 0. Five patients underwent LINX, eleven underwent fundoplication; one Dor, ten Toupet. Mean pre-operative quality of life score was 31.1; at six months mean score was 15.5. At one year this was 4. Conclusion The National Hiatal Surgery Registry facilitates easy acquisition of surgeon specific PROM data over a short- and long-term period. Patient attrition is low, demonstrating acceptability. Our data demonstrate significantly improved patient reported quality of life postoperatively for all hiatal surgery.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_9)
Torbay Hospital (GB)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.