OGC O06 - Socioeconomic Health Inequality in Oesophago-gastric Cancer in a Single Tertiary Centre: On Behalf of Greater Manchester OG Unit

Abstract Background Oesophagogastric cancer (OGC) 5-year survival is poor (15%). Only 34% of patients are considered for potentially curative treatment, which is associated with a 41% chance of survival. In other cancer, deprivation is associated with poor outcomes. This study aims to determine the association between deprivation, tumour and treatment intent (TI), and 5-year all-cause mortality (M) in OGC. Method This retrospective cohort study analysed patients newly diagnosed with OGC (adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma) across Greater Manchester between January 2018 and January 2023. TI was defined as the treatment pathway, at completion of staging investigations, either curative (pathway to resection or definitive chemoradiotherapy) or palliative (best supportive care, palliative chemotherapy or radiotherapy). Statistical analysis encompassed methods such as binary logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves with adjustments made for age, gender, and clinical stage. IMD scores were grouped from deciles into quintiles leaving 5 groups, with IMD1 representing the most deprived. Results 3027 patients were included (2102, 69.4% males). Patients in IMD1 were diagnosed 4 years younger than in IMD5 (most affluent) (median age 70 (IQR=17) vs 74 (IQR=16), p<0.001). There was a higher proportion of deprived patients (32.9% IMD1 vs 15.3% IMD5, p<0.001). The proportion of stage 4b disease in IMD1 compared with IMD5 was not different (406 (40.7%) vs 174 (37.5%), p=0.081). The median survival was lower in IMD1 compared with IMD5 (0.81 vs 0.90 years, p=0.074). Following adjustment for confounders IMD1 was associated with a poorer overall survival when compared with IMD5 (HR 1.16, CI[1.02-1.32],p=0.020). Conclusion This study highlights a significant health inequality in the outcomes of OGC. Poorer outcomes in the most deprived group were independent of tumour stage, gender and age. Urgent measures to address socioeconomic health inequalities need to be instigated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae271.019
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OGC O06 - Socioeconomic Health Inequality in Oesophago-gastric Cancer in a Single Tertiary Centre: On Behalf of Greater Manchester OG Unit

Munir Tarazi, Arfon Powell, Javed Sultan, Christine Farnworth et al.
British journal of surgery
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

OGC O06 - Socioeconomic Health Inequality in Oesophago-gastric Cancer in a Single Tertiary Centre: On Behalf of Greater Manchester OG Unit

Munir Tarazi, Arfon Powell, Javed Sultan, Christine Farnworth, Jack Thomson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Oesophagogastric cancer (OGC) 5-year survival is poor (15%). Only 34% of patients are considered for potentially curative treatment, which is associated with a 41% chance of survival. In other cancer, deprivation is associated with poor outcomes. This study aims to determine the association between deprivation, tumour and treatment intent (TI), and 5-year all-cause mortality (M) in OGC. Method This retrospective cohort study analysed patients newly diagnosed with OGC (adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma) across Greater Manchester between January 2018 and January 2023. TI was defined as the treatment pathway, at completion of staging investigations, either curative (pathway to resection or definitive chemoradiotherapy) or palliative (best supportive care, palliative chemotherapy or radiotherapy). Statistical analysis encompassed methods such as binary logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves with adjustments made for age, gender, and clinical stage. IMD scores were grouped from deciles into quintiles leaving 5 groups, with IMD1 representing the most deprived. Results 3027 patients were included (2102, 69.4% males). Patients in IMD1 were diagnosed 4 years younger than in IMD5 (most affluent) (median age 70 (IQR=17) vs 74 (IQR=16), p<0.001). There was a higher proportion of deprived patients (32.9% IMD1 vs 15.3% IMD5, p<0.001). The proportion of stage 4b disease in IMD1 compared with IMD5 was not different (406 (40.7%) vs 174 (37.5%), p=0.081). The median survival was lower in IMD1 compared with IMD5 (0.81 vs 0.90 years, p=0.074). Following adjustment for confounders IMD1 was associated with a poorer overall survival when compared with IMD5 (HR 1.16, CI[1.02-1.32],p=0.020). Conclusion This study highlights a significant health inequality in the outcomes of OGC. Poorer outcomes in the most deprived group were independent of tumour stage, gender and age. Urgent measures to address socioeconomic health inequalities need to be instigated.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_9)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Northern Health and Social Care Trust (GB), Digital Research Alliance of Canada, Imperial College London (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.