BS O03 - One-stage conversion of Adjustable Gastric band (AGB) to One-anastomosis Gastric Bypass (cOAGB) versus Sleeve Gastrectomy (cSG): A single-center experience with a short and mid-term Follow-up

Abstract Background Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band was a common bariatric procedure . However; due to its failure rate some patients sought another revisional surgery. In which, we compared two of the most common Bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) performed nowadays: the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic one- anastomosis gastric bypass. Method A prospective cohort study was conducted from June 2020 to June 2022 at a single medical center, which included 77 patients undergoing single-stage conversion to (cOAGB) vs (cSG). Patients were reassessed for weight loss, associated medical problems remission and post-operative complications at 6, 12, and 18 months. Results Group (I) was 43 patients who underwent cOAGB and Group (II) was 34 patients who underwent cSG. The BMI was calculated post-operative at three visits. Both groups had no statistically significant values at 6 and 12 months follow-up. However, patients who underwent cOAGB after 18 months of follow-up achieved lower BMI than those who underwent cSG . Regarding EBWL% there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups after 6, 12 and 18 months follow-up. Regarding associated medical problems remission with follow-up 18 months post-operative , there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups Conclusion This study suggests that the conversion of LAGB to either cOAGB or cSG could be feasibly performed in a single-stage operation. cOAGB had a significant difference as regards the weight loss results than cSG among the mid-term follow-up. However, there is no significant difference in the postoperative complications and the resolution of the co-morbidities. Therefore, cOAGB could provide a reliable alternative but needs to be substantiated in future long-term studies.