HPB SO34 - Inter-fascial/Wound Catheter with Local Anaesthetic Infusion vs Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Hepato-biliary Surgery (HILA) – A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract Background Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) offers effective pain control after open hepato-biliary surgery, however it is associated with several limitations that delay post-operative recovery. This study compared outcomes between inter-fascial/wound catheter with local anaesthetic infusion (IF/WC) and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) following open liver and biliary surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) setting. Method Retrospective cohort data of all open liver and biliary surgery between August 2023 to February 2024 that used inter-fascial/wound catheter with local anaesthetic infusion (IF/WC) or thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). Baseline characteristics were similar in the combined IF (n=17) and WC (n=7) group vs TEA (n=39) group. Technical failure rates were 12.5% in the IF/WC group vs 20.5% in the TEA group, p=0.509. Results Vasopressor requirement immediately post-surgery decreased by 32.7% in IF/WC vs TEA group [8.3% vs 41.0%, p=0.005], whereas none in the IF/WC group required vasopressor beyond 24 hours [0 vs 25.6%, p=0.010]. Length of critical care stay reduced by 1.5 days [1.79 vs 3.28 days; 95% CI 0.28-2.70, p=0.016] while length of hospital stay reduced by 2.6 days [5.79 vs 8.41 days; 95% CI 0.72-4.52, p=0.022] in the IF/WC vs TEA group. Admission cost reduced by £3941 per patient in the IF/WC vs TEA group [£10323 vs £14265; 95% CI 661-7222, p=0.019]. Conclusion Inter-fascial/wound catheter with local anaesthetic infusion (IF/WC) is an effective, safe and cost-saving alternative to thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) with significant decrease in post-operative vasopressor requirements, and length of critical care and hospital stay.