HPB SO59 - How do Previous Biliary Interventions Affect the Operative and Postoperative Outcomes Of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) and Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE)?

Abstract Background Laparoscopic biliary surgery is perceived to be difficult in patients who had undergone previous biliary interventions; ERCP, cholecystostomy or cholecystectomy. Our objective was to evaluate the referral pattern, the preoperative characteristics and operative and postoperative outcomes in such patients. Method Analysis of prospectively collected data from patients treated by a specialist biliary unit dedicated to index admission LC and single session laparoscopic management of bile duct stones. In spite of a policy of no preoperative endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones the unit inevitably received some patients who had had previous ERCP at other hospitals prior to referral or were initially unfit when admitted to the base hospital and required ERCP. In a series of 6140 LC and LCBDE 158 patients (2.57%) had already undergone ERCP and 31 (0.5%) had undergone cholecystectomies (18), cholecystostomies (9) or attempted cholecystectomy. Results Of 158 pre-referral ERCPs, 130 (82.3%) were referred from other hospitals, 36 (22.8%) having had more than one ERCP. 83.5% had suspected CBD stones. LC difficulty grade was IV to V in 48.7%. 112 patients (70.9%) required LCBDE. There were 10.1% biliary related complications, 3 re-operations, one conversion and one mortality. of 31 patients with previous biliary interventions, 58% came from other units or hospitals. A third had already undergone ERCP. 61.3% had LC difficulty grades IV or V. The 18 un-cholecystectomised patients needed LCBDE with no conversions or bile duct injuries. There were only 2 (6.5%) biliary related complications. Conclusion While previous biliary interventions understandably increased the difficulty of LC they did not adversely affect operative and postoperative outcomes. Such surgery should be undertaken in the specialist setting as 70.9% of those with previous endoscopic and 58.1% of those with previous surgical or radiologically guided biliary interventions require LCBDE. Implementing definitive surgical interventions during the index admission can achieve a substantial reduction in re-admission rates, and overall decrease in hospital episodes without significant morbidity, re-interventions or mortality. This enhances the quality of life for patients who would otherwise be subjected to multiple repeat ERCPs and yields significant cost benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae271.290
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HPB SO59 - How do Previous Biliary Interventions Affect the Operative and Postoperative Outcomes Of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) and Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE)?

Ahmad H. M. Nassar, Asmaa Omran, Khurram Khan, Israa Hayyawi
British journal of surgery
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

HPB SO59 - How do Previous Biliary Interventions Affect the Operative and Postoperative Outcomes Of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) and Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE)?

Ahmad H. M. Nassar, Asmaa Omran, Khurram Khan, Israa Hayyawi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Laparoscopic biliary surgery is perceived to be difficult in patients who had undergone previous biliary interventions; ERCP, cholecystostomy or cholecystectomy. Our objective was to evaluate the referral pattern, the preoperative characteristics and operative and postoperative outcomes in such patients. Method Analysis of prospectively collected data from patients treated by a specialist biliary unit dedicated to index admission LC and single session laparoscopic management of bile duct stones. In spite of a policy of no preoperative endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones the unit inevitably received some patients who had had previous ERCP at other hospitals prior to referral or were initially unfit when admitted to the base hospital and required ERCP. In a series of 6140 LC and LCBDE 158 patients (2.57%) had already undergone ERCP and 31 (0.5%) had undergone cholecystectomies (18), cholecystostomies (9) or attempted cholecystectomy. Results Of 158 pre-referral ERCPs, 130 (82.3%) were referred from other hospitals, 36 (22.8%) having had more than one ERCP. 83.5% had suspected CBD stones. LC difficulty grade was IV to V in 48.7%. 112 patients (70.9%) required LCBDE. There were 10.1% biliary related complications, 3 re-operations, one conversion and one mortality. of 31 patients with previous biliary interventions, 58% came from other units or hospitals. A third had already undergone ERCP. 61.3% had LC difficulty grades IV or V. The 18 un-cholecystectomised patients needed LCBDE with no conversions or bile duct injuries. There were only 2 (6.5%) biliary related complications. Conclusion While previous biliary interventions understandably increased the difficulty of LC they did not adversely affect operative and postoperative outcomes. Such surgery should be undertaken in the specialist setting as 70.9% of those with previous endoscopic and 58.1% of those with previous surgical or radiologically guided biliary interventions require LCBDE. Implementing definitive surgical interventions during the index admission can achieve a substantial reduction in re-admission rates, and overall decrease in hospital episodes without significant morbidity, re-interventions or mortality. This enhances the quality of life for patients who would otherwise be subjected to multiple repeat ERCPs and yields significant cost benefits.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_9)
Inverclyde Royal Hospital (GB), Golden Jubilee National Hospital (GB), Hairmyres Hospital (GB), Queen Elizabeth Hospital (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.