OGC SO32 - Propensity score analysis of the impact of deprivation and the COVID-19 pandemic on Upper Gastro Intestinal (UGI) cancer surgery outcomes

Abstract Background Deprivation is a complex, multifaceted concept, not synonymous with poverty, but with the potential to widen health inequalities. This study aimed to explore demographic disparities in patients undergoing UGI cancer surgery in a UK regional cancer network during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method Consecutive 881 patients were studied prospectively (median age 67 (24 - 89) yr., 703 m, 178 f; 518 oesophageal, 363 gastric; 837 Adeno-, 44 SCC) over 13 years. The COVID-19 pandemic was defined as the 24-month period from February 1, 2020 to January 31, 2022, during which 118 patients were treated. The demographic profile of the pandemic cohort was compared with that of the 763 patients treated outside this period incorporating a propensity score analysis. Primary outcomes were operative morbidity, mortality, and one-year survival. Wales’ Index of Multiple Deprivation was used to assess deprivation disparity. Results A 24% reduction in the number of cancer operations was observed during the first pandemic year. No difference was observed in age, gender, histology, tumour site, ASA grade, or oncological treatment. During COVID-19 the proportion of patients from the two most deprived quartiles receiving potentially curative surgery fell from 53.2% to 40.7% (p=0.012). No difference was observed in severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo >3, 22.2% vs. 19.8%, p=0.897), 30-day mortality (2.5% vs. 2.4%, p=0.886), or one-year survival (82.4% vs. 78.8%, p=0.374). Conclusion UGI cancer surgery safely continued during COVID-19, but patients from areas of high deprivation were over 20% less likely to access curative surgical treatment compared with before and after COVID-19. This emphasises the need for bespoke strategies to mitigate the disproportionate impact of any future pandemic on patients living in deprived geographical areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae271.156
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OGC SO32 - Propensity score analysis of the impact of deprivation and the COVID-19 pandemic on Upper Gastro Intestinal (UGI) cancer surgery outcomes

J.Thornwell Witherspoon, Wyn G. Lewis, Guy Blackshaw, Antonio Foliaki et al.
British journal of surgery
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
article

OGC SO32 - Propensity score analysis of the impact of deprivation and the COVID-19 pandemic on Upper Gastro Intestinal (UGI) cancer surgery outcomes

J.Thornwell Witherspoon, Wyn G. Lewis, Guy Blackshaw, Antonio Foliaki, Geraint L Herbert, Usman Khalid, Tarig Abdelrahman, Arfon Powell
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Deprivation is a complex, multifaceted concept, not synonymous with poverty, but with the potential to widen health inequalities. This study aimed to explore demographic disparities in patients undergoing UGI cancer surgery in a UK regional cancer network during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method Consecutive 881 patients were studied prospectively (median age 67 (24 - 89) yr., 703 m, 178 f; 518 oesophageal, 363 gastric; 837 Adeno-, 44 SCC) over 13 years. The COVID-19 pandemic was defined as the 24-month period from February 1, 2020 to January 31, 2022, during which 118 patients were treated. The demographic profile of the pandemic cohort was compared with that of the 763 patients treated outside this period incorporating a propensity score analysis. Primary outcomes were operative morbidity, mortality, and one-year survival. Wales’ Index of Multiple Deprivation was used to assess deprivation disparity. Results A 24% reduction in the number of cancer operations was observed during the first pandemic year. No difference was observed in age, gender, histology, tumour site, ASA grade, or oncological treatment. During COVID-19 the proportion of patients from the two most deprived quartiles receiving potentially curative surgery fell from 53.2% to 40.7% (p=0.012). No difference was observed in severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo >3, 22.2% vs. 19.8%, p=0.897), 30-day mortality (2.5% vs. 2.4%, p=0.886), or one-year survival (82.4% vs. 78.8%, p=0.374). Conclusion UGI cancer surgery safely continued during COVID-19, but patients from areas of high deprivation were over 20% less likely to access curative surgical treatment compared with before and after COVID-19. This emphasises the need for bespoke strategies to mitigate the disproportionate impact of any future pandemic on patients living in deprived geographical areas.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_9)
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (GB), Royal Gwent Hospital (GB), University Hospital of Wales (GB), Aneurin Bevan University Health Board (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Salford Royal Hospital (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.