BS SO03 - Revisional bariatric surgery following sleeve gastrectomy, a meta-analysis comparing RYGB and OAGB

Abstract Background The number of bariatric operations is on the rise each year. Sleeve gastrectomy is the most popular procedure however often requires a revision surgery because of insufficient weight loss, weight regain or GERD. The most popular procedures are RYGB and OAGB. Our primary outcome was to look at the effect on weight loss in patients undergoing revision surgery and the secondary outcomes were gastro-oesophageal reflux, BMI difference, operative time, bleeding and anastomotic leak Method A systematic electronic search was undertaken using PubMed, MEDLINE®, Ovid®, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar™ according to PRISMA. Initial search identified 2,546 articles, after screening seven papers met the inclusions criteria, six retrospective studies and one RCT. Results There were a total of 802 patients that fit the inclusion criteria. 390 patients had a OAGB and another 412 had a RYBG. All patients previously had sleeve gastrectomy for weight loss. The length of follow-up was 12 months for our primary outcome. We found no statistically significant difference in %EWL between OAGB and RYGB (p=0.11). The incidence of post-operative reflux was statistically significantly higher in the OAGB group (16% vs 10.1%, p<0.003). Operative time was statistically significantly lower in the OAGB group (p=0.04). Conclusion Our meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the two revision bariatric surgery procedure for %EWL. RYGB was superior to OAGB in reducing the incidence of symptomatic GERD while OAGB had a significant shorter operative time.