HPB SO49 - EUS guided biliary drainage prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy - The Leeds experience

Abstract Background Biliary obstruction is a common manifestation of biliary tract cancer. Decompression is indicated if patients develop systemic illness due to the obstruction or to facilitate chemotherapy. Stent insertion via ERCP is the current first line decompressive technique, although in certain situations such as duodenal/ampullary obstruction, is not always feasible. When ERCP has failed, our centre has implemented using lumen apposing metallic stents (LAMS) delivered by the HOT AXIOS™ system to create a draining choledochoduodenostomy. Our aim is to report on our experience of carrying out pancreaticoduodenectomy after biliary drainage has been achieved with this technique. Method All patients who underwent biliary drainage with a LAMS and then surgical resection of a biliary tract cancer were identified from a prospective database. Both procedures were carried out at St James’s Hospital, Leeds, between June 2018 and May 2024 by expert gastroenterology and pancreatic surgical consultants. Procedural and inpatient notes were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcomes were the assessment of technical feasibility of pancreaticoduodenectomy and of perioperative complications, classified by the Clavien-Dindo (CD) system. Secondary outcomes were the safe and clinically effective (defined as >50% reduction of serum bilirubin within 7 days) application of LAMS. Results Thirteen patients were identified with a median age of 69 (51-81), twelve requiring drainage due to jaundice and one due to cholangitis. Duration to resection was median 68 days (12-377). Surgical resection was successful in all thirteen patients, in seven cases the surgeons commented on fibrosis due to the stent, with one qualifying that this was no more than a conventional biliary stent. Postoperatively five patients had no complications, one CD grade 1, five CD grade 2 and one CD grade 5. There were no significant post endoscopic complications and 10 patients demonstrated clinical effectiveness of the LAMS. Conclusion ERCP is the current first line method of drainage in malignant biliary obstruction. Technical success is reliant on unimpeded access to the bile duct. The HOT AXIOSÔ system circumvents this reliance by delivering a LAMS in a single stage forming a draining choledochoduodenostomy. Our centre’s experience suggests that it is a safe and effective method of biliary drainage which does not impede surgical resection. Additionally, it is not associated with the risk of post procedural pancreatitis. Our experience justifies further large-scale studies into this technique with consideration for its use not only when ERCP is not possible.