EGS SO06 - Emergency provision for Oesophago-Gastric Surgery in the United Kingdom: A National Survey

Abstract Background Oesophagogastric (OG) emergency conditions may require specialised intervention in centralised OG cancer surgery units. Recently published AUGIS OG commissioning guidance recommends OG units provide 24/7 on-call cover for internal and external OG emergency referrals with a formalised rota. However, there may be widespread inconsistent provision of OG emergency services across United Kingdom (UK) regions with significant workforce, capacity, and funding challenges. This may lead to barriers to provision of on-call OG services. Currently there is no research that establishes current OG on-call coverage or explores OG surgeons’ perceptions and attitudes towards providing this service. Method An 11-item electronic questionnaire was developed at an OG cancer unit to identify OG consultant emergency on-call coverage at NHS OG cancer units in the UK. The questionnaire was initially piloted among OG surgeons for refinement and subsequently disseminated through professional networks (AUGIS), direct contact, and snowballing. It was active for three weeks in January 2024. Secondary outcomes included: identifying barriers to providing an emergency OG service; defining the scope of conditions acceptable for transfer; understanding current referral mechanisms and examining OG consultant attitudes and perceptions towards providing an on-call OG service. Results 71 consultant OG surgeons from 26 UK OG cancer units responded (Figure 1). 61% (n=43) report participating in a 24/7 formalised emergency OG on-call rota, staffed by a median of 5 (range 3-8) surgeons. Among the nine respondents from three centres without a formal OG emergency service, all cited limited funding as the primary barrier. Only 31% (n=19) used auditable referral mechanisms like email or online systems. 97% percent (n=69) of respondents perceive an OG emergency service to be beneficial for patients, and 86% (n=61) agreed it should be nationally mandated for OG cancer units to provide a 24/7 service. Conclusion Consultant OG surgeons recognize the importance of delivering high-quality OG emergency services. However, the data indicates inconsistent delivery across the UK. Given the seriousness of OG emergencies, mandatory provision of this service with appropriate funding and remuneration is essential. Several workforce challenges, including potential impacts on OG cancer resection volume and provision of General Surgical on-call, need to be addressed. Ultimately, patients require timely and specialised intervention. As one respondent emphasized: "A situation where surgeons in non-OG centres can spend a whole night ringing around various OG centres looking for help with a Boerhaave perforation is unacceptable."