EGS SO30 - Management of Iatrogenic Oesophageal Perforations in the era of Endo-Vacuum Therapy- Preliminary Results of a Single-Institution Study

Abstract Background Iatrogenic oesophageal perforation (IOP) following diagnostic and therapeutic interventions at the oesophagus or adjacent organs are responsible for nearly half of oesophageal perforations. If not recognised within 24 hours of injury, then they are associated with devastating morbidity and mortality. Available treatment options encompass non-operative for early perforation without sepsis, endoscopic with endoclip/stent and surgical including primary repair, exclusion and diversion or oesophagectomy. Recently, Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy (EVT) has been introduced as safe and effective alternative approach. We sought to assess treatment outcomes in patients with IOPs prior to and during periods where EVT was available as treatment option. Method A single-centre retrospective cohort study incorporating all consecutive patients (N=30) presented or transferred to our tertiary oesophagogastric unit for IOP management between 01/01/2009-31/12/2023 was undertaken. Patients with anastomotic leak post-surgery or spontaneous perforation secondary to malignancy or benign pathology were excluded. Primary study-outcomes were treatment type including non-operative, EVT after 01/01/2018 or other endoscopic therapy, surgical operation including laparotomy, thoracotomy, primary defect repair or over a T-tube, disconnection with oesophagostomy, stenting or other interventional radiology procedures and their rate of success or failure. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, 90-day complications requiring re-intervention or re-admission, 30-, 90-day and 1-year mortality. Results In 2009-2017 pre-EVT period, 11/30 patients were managed a) non-surgically 7/11, b) endoclip 3/11 and stenting 1/11. 30-day and 90-day mortality were 1/11, 90-day morbidity Clavien-Dindo >IIIa 3/11 (27.3%), 90-day reintervention 8/11 (72.7%), median LOS 27 days. In 2018-2023 EVT period, 19/30 patients were treated with a) laparotomy, left thoracotomy, defect repair over t-tube, chest drainage in 5/19, b) non-surgical 7/19, c) IR NJT, stent or PEG in 6/19 d) EVT in 4/19. 30-day mortality was 0/19, 90-day mortality 1/19 (5.2%), 90-day morbidity Clavien-Dindo >IIIa 7/19 (36.8%), 90-day reintervention 9/19 (47.4%), median LOS 61 days. 1-year mortality was 0/19 for both. Conclusion EVT therapy appears to be a feasible additional treatment modality in the management of iatrogenic oesophageal perforations. Careful patient selection, therapeutic endoscopic expertise, knowledge of the technique, multidisciplinary approach and team collaboration are essentials for favourable outcomes. Of note, management of oesophageal perforations in a dedicated UGI centre is directly related to patient outcomes and is a sine qua non.