BN SO24 - Predicting incidental gallbladder cancer: A protocol for identifying predictive factors of incidentally detected gallbladder cancer and prospective validation of a scoring system to allow selective histological analysis of the gallbladder

Abstract Background Incidental Gallbladder Cancer (iGBC) is a rare complication of cholecystectomy, with a UK incidence of 0.14-0.3%. Despite its rarity, most gallbladder specimens are analysed histologically. Some comparable countries undertake Selective Histological Analysis (SHA), selecting high-risk specimens for histology based on clinical judgement or postoperative inspection. However, evidence suggests a third of diagnoses can be missed with these approaches. Swedish and Dutch diagnostic scores incorporate few risk factors and are not generalisable to the UK. We present a protocol for a UK study aiming to develop a detailed diagnostic score for iGBC to reliably stratify patients by their risk of iGBC. Method This UK multicentre, cross-sectional, trainee-led study includes adult patients undergoing cholecystectomy for benign indications. It incorporates a feasibility study and an adaptive design, and has been submitted for ethical review. A parallel qualitative study will explore attitudes towards the risk of iGBC and the acceptability of SHA among patients and healthcare professionals. The feasibility phase will include 500 patients over six months, collecting data on patient risk factors for iGBC, preoperative investigations, operative findings, and histology results. Exclusion criteria include cholecystectomy as a secondary procedure, polyps over 5mm, and conditions known to increase the risk of biliary tract cancers. Results Following the feasibility phase, the recruitment rate and data completeness will be evaluated. Outcomes will be assessed against anticipated values, and collaborators will be surveyed to identify challenges with data collection. Necessary adjustments to the electronic case record form or overall protocol will be made, and the recruitment target will be recalculated based on an updated sample size calculation. When the study meets specified progression criteria, additional sites will be recruited, and data collection will continue to meet the required sample size. A detailed statistical analysis plan will be provided at a later date. Conclusion This protocol describes a UK diagnostic modelling study aimed at developing a risk-stratification score for iGBC in patients undergoing routine cholecystectomy, identifying high-risk patients and facilitating SHA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae271.195
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BN SO24 - Predicting incidental gallbladder cancer: A protocol for identifying predictive factors of incidentally detected gallbladder cancer and prospective validation of a scoring system to allow selective histological analysis of the gallbladder

Jos M. Latour, Lexy Sorrell, Somaiah Aroori, Oliver Brown
British journal of surgery
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

BN SO24 - Predicting incidental gallbladder cancer: A protocol for identifying predictive factors of incidentally detected gallbladder cancer and prospective validation of a scoring system to allow selective histological analysis of the gallbladder

Jos M. Latour, Lexy Sorrell, Somaiah Aroori, Oliver Brown
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Incidental Gallbladder Cancer (iGBC) is a rare complication of cholecystectomy, with a UK incidence of 0.14-0.3%. Despite its rarity, most gallbladder specimens are analysed histologically. Some comparable countries undertake Selective Histological Analysis (SHA), selecting high-risk specimens for histology based on clinical judgement or postoperative inspection. However, evidence suggests a third of diagnoses can be missed with these approaches. Swedish and Dutch diagnostic scores incorporate few risk factors and are not generalisable to the UK. We present a protocol for a UK study aiming to develop a detailed diagnostic score for iGBC to reliably stratify patients by their risk of iGBC. Method This UK multicentre, cross-sectional, trainee-led study includes adult patients undergoing cholecystectomy for benign indications. It incorporates a feasibility study and an adaptive design, and has been submitted for ethical review. A parallel qualitative study will explore attitudes towards the risk of iGBC and the acceptability of SHA among patients and healthcare professionals. The feasibility phase will include 500 patients over six months, collecting data on patient risk factors for iGBC, preoperative investigations, operative findings, and histology results. Exclusion criteria include cholecystectomy as a secondary procedure, polyps over 5mm, and conditions known to increase the risk of biliary tract cancers. Results Following the feasibility phase, the recruitment rate and data completeness will be evaluated. Outcomes will be assessed against anticipated values, and collaborators will be surveyed to identify challenges with data collection. Necessary adjustments to the electronic case record form or overall protocol will be made, and the recruitment target will be recalculated based on an updated sample size calculation. When the study meets specified progression criteria, additional sites will be recruited, and data collection will continue to meet the required sample size. A detailed statistical analysis plan will be provided at a later date. Conclusion This protocol describes a UK diagnostic modelling study aimed at developing a risk-stratification score for iGBC in patients undergoing routine cholecystectomy, identifying high-risk patients and facilitating SHA.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_9)
University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust (GB), University of Plymouth (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.