HPB SO26 - Evaluation of Theatre Database Accuracy in a Tertiary HPB Center According to NCIP Standards in the UK

Abstract Background The goal of creating the NCIP (National Clinical Improvement Programme) theatre data set discovery information system is to allow NHS Improvement to evaluate how theatre data can improve the attribution of surgical activities, as documented in Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) Admitted Patient Care (APC) data, to individual consultants. The success of NCIP is at risk due to the inaccurate attribution of existing activity data to consultants. Method The NCIP theatre database for the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgery department was compiled over a 12-month period (from April 2022 to April 2023) and analyzed based on the operating consultant recorded in the operative notes, clinical letters, and the Carfelow system (admitting office records). Results In Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH), 143 major liver and pancreatic resections were performed, including 38 Whipple’s procedures (both classic and Pylorus-preserving Pancreatico-Duodenectomy), 19 Distal Pancreatectomies, and 86 Liver resections. Of these, only 58 patients (40.6%) had correct entries in the NCIP database regarding the operating surgeon. The NCIP data inaccuracies for the operating consultant were 65.8% (25/38) for Whipple’s procedures, 57.9% (11/19) for Distal Pancreatectomies, and 56.97% (49/86) for Liver resections. Conversely, the NCIP data was 100% accurate concerning the assigned consultant on Careflow, which matches the clinical letters from the outpatient clinic. Conclusion The gap between the NCIP database and the admitting office database leads to inaccurate attributions of surgical activity. This hinders learning and improvement efforts essential for achieving program benefits and prevents providers from complying with license conditions and delivering efficient healthcare services. To ensure accurate HES data, admitting officers should request proper communication and accurate consultant codes from consultant secretaries to ensure accurate data across the different hospital systems

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae271.259
Primary Topic
Education, Management, Technology, Human Resources
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HPB SO26 - Evaluation of Theatre Database Accuracy in a Tertiary HPB Center According to NCIP Standards in the UK

M. G. Fouad, Suzanne Malek, Ian J. Beckingham
British journal of surgery
Education, Management, Technology, Human Resources
article

HPB SO26 - Evaluation of Theatre Database Accuracy in a Tertiary HPB Center According to NCIP Standards in the UK

M. G. Fouad, Suzanne Malek, Ian J. Beckingham
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The goal of creating the NCIP (National Clinical Improvement Programme) theatre data set discovery information system is to allow NHS Improvement to evaluate how theatre data can improve the attribution of surgical activities, as documented in Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) Admitted Patient Care (APC) data, to individual consultants. The success of NCIP is at risk due to the inaccurate attribution of existing activity data to consultants. Method The NCIP theatre database for the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) surgery department was compiled over a 12-month period (from April 2022 to April 2023) and analyzed based on the operating consultant recorded in the operative notes, clinical letters, and the Carfelow system (admitting office records). Results In Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH), 143 major liver and pancreatic resections were performed, including 38 Whipple’s procedures (both classic and Pylorus-preserving Pancreatico-Duodenectomy), 19 Distal Pancreatectomies, and 86 Liver resections. Of these, only 58 patients (40.6%) had correct entries in the NCIP database regarding the operating surgeon. The NCIP data inaccuracies for the operating consultant were 65.8% (25/38) for Whipple’s procedures, 57.9% (11/19) for Distal Pancreatectomies, and 56.97% (49/86) for Liver resections. Conversely, the NCIP data was 100% accurate concerning the assigned consultant on Careflow, which matches the clinical letters from the outpatient clinic. Conclusion The gap between the NCIP database and the admitting office database leads to inaccurate attributions of surgical activity. This hinders learning and improvement efforts essential for achieving program benefits and prevents providers from complying with license conditions and delivering efficient healthcare services. To ensure accurate HES data, admitting officers should request proper communication and accurate consultant codes from consultant secretaries to ensure accurate data across the different hospital systems

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Education, Management, Technology, Human Resources
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

HPB SO26 - Evaluation of Theatre Database Accuracy in a Tertiary HPB Center According to NCIP Standards in the UK — M. G. Fouad, Suzanne Malek, et al. · British journal of surgery (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS