Key determinants for the commercial feasibility of maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS)

Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship (MASS) technologies have been developing rapidly in the last decade, but the commercial feasibility and implementation potential of MASS for merchant shipping is still unclear. To unleash the full potential of the technological development, this study investigates the feasibility of possible MASS variants for merchant shipping. We design a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework incorporating nine key determinants for MASS adoption. Three MASS variants with different degrees of autonomy and two shipping routes are evaluated. Perspectives of relevant maritime professionals were solicited through a web-survey, and the Bayesian Best-Worst Method (BWM) was used for the analysis of the collected data. We find that navigation anti-collision-anti-grounding systems, cybersecurity risks, and capital costs are the three most important criteria for the commercialization of MASS. The analysis further revealed that degree two MASS for intra-European container trade in the Mediterranean and Baltic using small-sized autonomous feeder vessels is considered as the most feasible for the commercialization of the MASS. • An assessment of MASS feasibility from stakeholder perspective. • Degree of autonomy and shipping route characteristics are considered. • Data from 34 respondents analysed through Bayesian Best-Worst method. • Anti-collision and anti-grounding system, cybersecurity, and capital costs are key determinants. • Degree two autonomy for smaller MASS in intra-European container trade is the most feasible option.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Policy
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106482
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Maritime Navigation and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key determinants for the commercial feasibility of maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS)

Hercules Haralambides, Halvor Schøyen, Theo Notteboom, Ziaul Haque Munim
20 citations
Marine Policy
Maritime Navigation and Safety
6.72
article

Key determinants for the commercial feasibility of maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS)

Hercules Haralambides, Halvor Schøyen, Theo Notteboom, Ziaul Haque Munim
article en
20 citations

Abstract

Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship (MASS) technologies have been developing rapidly in the last decade, but the commercial feasibility and implementation potential of MASS for merchant shipping is still unclear. To unleash the full potential of the technological development, this study investigates the feasibility of possible MASS variants for merchant shipping. We design a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework incorporating nine key determinants for MASS adoption. Three MASS variants with different degrees of autonomy and two shipping routes are evaluated. Perspectives of relevant maritime professionals were solicited through a web-survey, and the Bayesian Best-Worst Method (BWM) was used for the analysis of the collected data. We find that navigation anti-collision-anti-grounding systems, cybersecurity risks, and capital costs are the three most important criteria for the commercialization of MASS. The analysis further revealed that degree two MASS for intra-European container trade in the Mediterranean and Baltic using small-sized autonomous feeder vessels is considered as the most feasible for the commercialization of the MASS. • An assessment of MASS feasibility from stakeholder perspective. • Degree of autonomy and shipping route characteristics are considered. • Data from 34 respondents analysed through Bayesian Best-Worst method. • Anti-collision and anti-grounding system, cybersecurity, and capital costs are key determinants. • Degree two autonomy for smaller MASS in intra-European container trade is the most feasible option.

Marine PolicyVol. 172
Novia University of Applied Sciences (FI), University of Antwerp (BE), Antwerp Maritime Academy (BE), Høyskolen Kristiania (NO), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO), Ghent University (BE), Antwerp Management School (BE), Dalian Maritime University (CN), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (FR), Paris School of Economics (FR), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Maritime Navigation and Safety
6.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.