Effect of Adjuvant Hyperbaric Oxygen Versus Routine Wound Care on Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: A comparative Study

Background: A diabetic foot ulcer is a challenging complication of diabetes thathas become a global health problem. The treatment process is troublesome for thepatient and healthcare team, especially in advanced cases. Hyperbaric Oxygentherapy (HBOT) in combination with standard methods of diabetic foot ulcersmanagement appears to be more effective than standard methods alone. Aim: Tocompare the effect of adjuvant hyperbaric oxygen therapy versus routine woundon diabetic foot ulcer healing. Subjects and Method: Design: A prospective non-experimental comparative study. Setting: at the medical, surgical and vascularsurgery departments, outpatient clinics and hyperbaric oxygen therapy unit atNasser Institute for Research and Treatment Cairo-Egypt. Subjects: sixty adultmale and female patients with diabetic foot ulcer divided into two groups 30patients in each of (the HBOT with standard wound management and standardwound management alone group) who met the inclusion criteria. Tools: I:Patient’s assessment data include: demographic and clinical backgroundinformation form, II: Wagner classification system, III: Numeric Pain scale andIV: MUNGS tool. Results: There was statistically significant difference betweenthe two groups regarding Wagner score at the end of two and three months (T=2.193, P=0.032) (T= 2.163, P=0.035) respectively. There was significantdifference regarding pain severity at the end of three months (T= 2.538, P=0.014).There was statistically significant difference between the two groups regardingMUNGS score at the end of three months follow-up (T= 2.298, P=0.025).Conclusion: HBOT in combination with standard methods of diabetic foot ulcersmanagement appears to be more effective than standard methods alone

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tanta Scientific Nursing Journal
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/tsnj.2024.391526
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Adjuvant Hyperbaric Oxygen Versus Routine Wound Care on Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: A comparative Study

Heba Ahmed Mohammed, Amel Mahmoud
Tanta Scientific Nursing Journal
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Effect of Adjuvant Hyperbaric Oxygen Versus Routine Wound Care on Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: A comparative Study

Heba Ahmed Mohammed, Amel Mahmoud
article en

Abstract

Background: A diabetic foot ulcer is a challenging complication of diabetes thathas become a global health problem. The treatment process is troublesome for thepatient and healthcare team, especially in advanced cases. Hyperbaric Oxygentherapy (HBOT) in combination with standard methods of diabetic foot ulcersmanagement appears to be more effective than standard methods alone. Aim: Tocompare the effect of adjuvant hyperbaric oxygen therapy versus routine woundon diabetic foot ulcer healing. Subjects and Method: Design: A prospective non-experimental comparative study. Setting: at the medical, surgical and vascularsurgery departments, outpatient clinics and hyperbaric oxygen therapy unit atNasser Institute for Research and Treatment Cairo-Egypt. Subjects: sixty adultmale and female patients with diabetic foot ulcer divided into two groups 30patients in each of (the HBOT with standard wound management and standardwound management alone group) who met the inclusion criteria. Tools: I:Patient’s assessment data include: demographic and clinical backgroundinformation form, II: Wagner classification system, III: Numeric Pain scale andIV: MUNGS tool. Results: There was statistically significant difference betweenthe two groups regarding Wagner score at the end of two and three months (T=2.193, P=0.032) (T= 2.163, P=0.035) respectively. There was significantdifference regarding pain severity at the end of three months (T= 2.538, P=0.014).There was statistically significant difference between the two groups regardingMUNGS score at the end of three months follow-up (T= 2.298, P=0.025).Conclusion: HBOT in combination with standard methods of diabetic foot ulcersmanagement appears to be more effective than standard methods alone

Tanta Scientific Nursing JournalVol. 35(4)
Cairo University (EG)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of Adjuvant Hyperbaric Oxygen Versus Routine Wound Care on Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: A comparative Study — Heba Ahmed Mohammed, Amel Mahmoud · Tanta Scientific Nursing Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS