Understanding public acceptance amidst controversy and ignorance: The case of industrial Carbon Capture and Storage in Germany

Carbon capture and storage technologies (CCS) are being discussed and tested in different countries to reduce industrial emissions. Public opinion about industrial CCS (iCCS) can be a key factor in whether it will be implemented. Yet, measuring public acceptance of CCS is a challenge: on the one hand, the use of CCS is the subject of intense and controversial political debate. On the other hand, a majority of people is still not aware of it. Thus, prior research has used informed choice questionnaires or experimental study designs to measure ad-hoc informed or spontaneous opinions . In this paper, we propose a new approach to measure public opinion, including only respondents with stated prior knowledge about iCCS. Based on a quantitative survey in Germany ( n = 1845), three questions are examined: do the results support our new approach to measure public opinion about iCCS? To what extent is there acceptance of iCCS and what factors influence acceptance in Germany? And what are implications for both the national political level and for the local deployment of iCCS? Results from the regression analysis show that five attitudes influence the general acceptance of iCCS in Germany: perceived local risks of climate change , advantages outweigh disadvantages , arguments about unavoidable emissions and about iCCS as a bridge technology , and the acceptance of local storage . Furthermore, descriptive results show high levels of associated risks with the transportation of CO 2 and lacking trust in relevant stakeholders for iCCS deployment (industry and energy utilities).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103838
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding public acceptance amidst controversy and ignorance: The case of industrial Carbon Capture and Storage in Germany

Felix Große-Kreul, Katja Witte, Aileen Reichmann, Nancy Dubinski Weber et al.
7 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
7.92
article

Understanding public acceptance amidst controversy and ignorance: The case of industrial Carbon Capture and Storage in Germany

Felix Große-Kreul, Katja Witte, Aileen Reichmann, Nancy Dubinski Weber, Laura Altstadt
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage technologies (CCS) are being discussed and tested in different countries to reduce industrial emissions. Public opinion about industrial CCS (iCCS) can be a key factor in whether it will be implemented. Yet, measuring public acceptance of CCS is a challenge: on the one hand, the use of CCS is the subject of intense and controversial political debate. On the other hand, a majority of people is still not aware of it. Thus, prior research has used informed choice questionnaires or experimental study designs to measure ad-hoc informed or spontaneous opinions . In this paper, we propose a new approach to measure public opinion, including only respondents with stated prior knowledge about iCCS. Based on a quantitative survey in Germany ( n = 1845), three questions are examined: do the results support our new approach to measure public opinion about iCCS? To what extent is there acceptance of iCCS and what factors influence acceptance in Germany? And what are implications for both the national political level and for the local deployment of iCCS? Results from the regression analysis show that five attitudes influence the general acceptance of iCCS in Germany: perceived local risks of climate change , advantages outweigh disadvantages , arguments about unavoidable emissions and about iCCS as a bridge technology , and the acceptance of local storage . Furthermore, descriptive results show high levels of associated risks with the transportation of CO 2 and lacking trust in relevant stakeholders for iCCS deployment (industry and energy utilities).

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 118
Lund University (SE), Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
7.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.