Towards a Redefinition of Squatter Rights: Adverse Possession in Ghana and the United Kingdom

Abstract A squatter may under certain circumstances extinguish the title of the registered proprietor and obtain good title. Many arguments have been made for and against these extensive rights. The broad consensus appears to be that in relation to registered land, there is less justification for it. The English Land Registration Act 2002 substantially modified the effect of adverse possession on registered land making adverse possession inapplicable to registered lands. Under Ghana’s new land law; Land Act, 2020 (Act 1036), except for public lands, a claim in adverse possession can defeat title to land whether registered or unregistered. This feature of Ghana’s land law appears unsatisfactory in light of the policy justifying land title registration. Using a comparative approach, this work evaluates adverse possession law in Ghana and England within the context of its objectives. The work established that the current regime on adverse possession does not effectively promote the objectives of land registration and requires reform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Journal of Comparative Law
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906x-13030002
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a Redefinition of Squatter Rights: Adverse Possession in Ghana and the United Kingdom

Solomon Faakye
1 citations
Global Journal of Comparative Law
Land Rights and Reforms
0.33
article

Towards a Redefinition of Squatter Rights: Adverse Possession in Ghana and the United Kingdom

Solomon Faakye
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract A squatter may under certain circumstances extinguish the title of the registered proprietor and obtain good title. Many arguments have been made for and against these extensive rights. The broad consensus appears to be that in relation to registered land, there is less justification for it. The English Land Registration Act 2002 substantially modified the effect of adverse possession on registered land making adverse possession inapplicable to registered lands. Under Ghana’s new land law; Land Act, 2020 (Act 1036), except for public lands, a claim in adverse possession can defeat title to land whether registered or unregistered. This feature of Ghana’s land law appears unsatisfactory in light of the policy justifying land title registration. Using a comparative approach, this work evaluates adverse possession law in Ghana and England within the context of its objectives. The work established that the current regime on adverse possession does not effectively promote the objectives of land registration and requires reform.

Global Journal of Comparative LawVol. 13(3)
University of Cape Coast (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Land Rights and Reforms
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.