(Mis)Governing World Football? Agency and (Non)Accountability in FIFA

Abstract We identify the variables that have enabled the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) to evade internal and external legal and juridical rules and processes, allowing it to prioritise the interests of its leaders and staff rather than its stakeholders. An interdisciplinary theoretical framework highlights the weaknesses of the legal systems, democratic processes, market mechanisms and regulatory regimes governing FIFA’s activities since its foundation. The historical processes transforming FIFA into a wealthy enterprise whose leaders could abuse their power with impunity are reviewed. An evaluation of the structural reforms introduced in 2016 following the exposure of FIFA corruption by US authorities in 2015 then shows how they have strengthened the internal and external rules and procedures enabling stakeholders to hold FIFA to account, whilst arguing that the reforms have not eliminated the leadership’s ability to ‘capture’ its democratic processes, exploit its monopolistic controls over lucrative contracts and evade regulatory controls.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqae036
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(Mis)Governing World Football? Agency and (Non)Accountability in FIFA

E. A. Brett, Alan Tomlinson
1 citations
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
1.13
article

(Mis)Governing World Football? Agency and (Non)Accountability in FIFA

E. A. Brett, Alan Tomlinson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We identify the variables that have enabled the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) to evade internal and external legal and juridical rules and processes, allowing it to prioritise the interests of its leaders and staff rather than its stakeholders. An interdisciplinary theoretical framework highlights the weaknesses of the legal systems, democratic processes, market mechanisms and regulatory regimes governing FIFA’s activities since its foundation. The historical processes transforming FIFA into a wealthy enterprise whose leaders could abuse their power with impunity are reviewed. An evaluation of the structural reforms introduced in 2016 following the exposure of FIFA corruption by US authorities in 2015 then shows how they have strengthened the internal and external rules and procedures enabling stakeholders to hold FIFA to account, whilst arguing that the reforms have not eliminated the leadership’s ability to ‘capture’ its democratic processes, exploit its monopolistic controls over lucrative contracts and evade regulatory controls.

Oxford Journal of Legal StudiesVol. 45(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

(Mis)Governing World Football? Agency and (Non)Accountability in FIFA — E. A. Brett, Alan Tomlinson · Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS