EGS SO20 - Management & outcomes from oesophageal perforations at a tertiary centre

Abstract Background Oesophageal perforations, whilst rare, are a challenging surgical emergency. Traditionally associated with high morbidity and mortality, outcomes have progressively improved over the past 25 years, likely due to advances in medical care and specialised management in high volume tertiary centres. This study examines the management strategies and outcomes from oesophageal perforations at our tertiary unit. Method A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on consecutive emergency cases of thoracic and junctional oesophageal perforations from January 2019 to June 2024. Data on patient demographics, baseline characteristics, management strategies and clinical outcomes were extracted from the patient’s electronic records. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated using the management approach and the extent of perforation as the predictive variables. Results 51 patients (mean age 47 years, 66% male) were treated for oesophageal perforations. The predominant aetiology was spontaneous (80%, n=41). Contained perforations were identified in 57% (n=29) of patients based on imaging, endoscopic, or operative findings. Conservative management was applied in 57% (n=29) of cases. Among those requiring intervention, 11 (58%) underwent surgery, while the remainder underwent endoscopical via vacuum therapy (32%, n=6) or stenting (11%, n=2). The mean in-hospital stay was 11 days (IQR 7-29). The 30-day mortality rate was 18% (n=9). Survival analysis revealed improved survival probabilities with contained perforations and non-surgical management strategies (p=0.023 and 0.001 respectively). Conclusion Our results demonstrate that the outcomes from oesophageal perforations continue to improve, reflecting ongoing advancements in therapeutic management. Furthermore, whilst surgery was once the mainstay, there appears to be a safe, increasing shift towards more conservative and endoscopic management.