OGC SO23 - Audit on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Oesophago-gastric Resections for Cancers

Abstract Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, have been designed to guide clinicians in managing patients post-operatively, reducing hospital stay, complications and readmissions. Our trust’s ERAS protocol includes guidance on oral intake initiation, drain, catheter and epidural removal, investigation frequency, medications required on discharge and early mobilization. However, implementation of ERAS protocols in complex oncological surgery can be challenging, due to the multiple factors included and increasing complexity. We aimed to assess the compliance of ERAS implementation in a high volume resectional oesophago-gastric unit, and subsequent impact on morbidity. Method A retrospective review of all patients who underwent oesophago-gastric resections during March-April 2024 was performed. Patients were included if they completed an oesophagectomy, or subtotal/total gastrectomy resection for cancer. Electronic records and medical notes were reviewed and compared to all aspects of the trust’s ERAS protocol. The adherence percentage to the protocol was calculated. Results 20 patients underwent surgery. 85% started their oral diet on time per ERAS protocol. Adherence to ERAS was lowest for epidural (52.6%, 95% within 24-hours of target), catheter (55%, 90% within 24-hours of target), apical (55.6%, 100% within 24-hours of target), basal (53.8%, 85.7% within 24-hours of target), and abdominal drain removals (81.8%, 90.9% within 24-hours of target). All patients mobilized within four days post-op, with 65% achieving daily mobilization. VTE prophylaxis was prescribed for all, and discharge medication adherence ranged from 86.7% to 100%. The mean hospital stay was 9 days post-oesophagectomy, with a 3.2% emergency department return rate. Conclusion Implementation of an ERAS protocol is feasible in complex oesophago-gastric cancer surgery. Effective involvement and training of allied health, specialist pain services and the whole surgical team can decrease morbidity and length of stay in oesophagectomy, while avoiding excess emergency department presentations. Ongoing training and feedback of allied health, pain services, and surgical team at all levels is important to ensure adequate compliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae271.148
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

OGC SO23 - Audit on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Oesophago-gastric Resections for Cancers

S M Barnes, Ashraf Tokhi, Simon L. Parsons, Christos Merkouris
British journal of surgery
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

OGC SO23 - Audit on Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Oesophago-gastric Resections for Cancers

S M Barnes, Ashraf Tokhi, Simon L. Parsons, Christos Merkouris
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, have been designed to guide clinicians in managing patients post-operatively, reducing hospital stay, complications and readmissions. Our trust’s ERAS protocol includes guidance on oral intake initiation, drain, catheter and epidural removal, investigation frequency, medications required on discharge and early mobilization. However, implementation of ERAS protocols in complex oncological surgery can be challenging, due to the multiple factors included and increasing complexity. We aimed to assess the compliance of ERAS implementation in a high volume resectional oesophago-gastric unit, and subsequent impact on morbidity. Method A retrospective review of all patients who underwent oesophago-gastric resections during March-April 2024 was performed. Patients were included if they completed an oesophagectomy, or subtotal/total gastrectomy resection for cancer. Electronic records and medical notes were reviewed and compared to all aspects of the trust’s ERAS protocol. The adherence percentage to the protocol was calculated. Results 20 patients underwent surgery. 85% started their oral diet on time per ERAS protocol. Adherence to ERAS was lowest for epidural (52.6%, 95% within 24-hours of target), catheter (55%, 90% within 24-hours of target), apical (55.6%, 100% within 24-hours of target), basal (53.8%, 85.7% within 24-hours of target), and abdominal drain removals (81.8%, 90.9% within 24-hours of target). All patients mobilized within four days post-op, with 65% achieving daily mobilization. VTE prophylaxis was prescribed for all, and discharge medication adherence ranged from 86.7% to 100%. The mean hospital stay was 9 days post-oesophagectomy, with a 3.2% emergency department return rate. Conclusion Implementation of an ERAS protocol is feasible in complex oesophago-gastric cancer surgery. Effective involvement and training of allied health, specialist pain services and the whole surgical team can decrease morbidity and length of stay in oesophagectomy, while avoiding excess emergency department presentations. Ongoing training and feedback of allied health, pain services, and surgical team at all levels is important to ensure adequate compliance.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_9)
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.