HPB SO69 - Comparison of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with standard pancreatosplenectomy for left sided pancreatic cancer

Abstract Background Long term survival of patients undergoing distal pancreatosplenectomy for left sided pancreatic cancer has not been satisfactory owing to inability to achieve negative resection margins. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) has been designed to achieve better margin resection and better lymph node clearance compared to the standard distal pancreatosplenectomy (SDP) for left sided pancreatic cancer. This results in better oncological outcomes and patient survival rates. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes from RAMPS and SDP. Method Literature search was performed to identify studies published in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library and google search. 13 Studies comparing RAMPS versus standard method of distal pancreatecetomy were included in the final meta-analysis. Revman 5.4 was used to perform the analysis and random effects model was used with results shown on forest plot. A total of 1450 patients were enrolled in the meta analysis with 685 in RAMPS and 765 patients in SDP group. R0 resection rate, recurrence rate, better overall survival and number of harvested lymph nodes were taken as primary outcomes. Results RAMPS was associated with better overall survival than SDP (HR-0.62, 95% CI - 0.38-0.91, p=0.03). The recurrence rate (OR-0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.97, p=0.04) was significantly less. R0 resection rate was higher in RAMPS but did not reach statistical significance (OR-1.47 CI0.93-2.3, p=0.10). Complications notably pancreatic fistula Showed favourable results in RAMPS along with other variables such as hospital stay, operative stay and blood loss but didn’t reach statistical Significance. Conclusion This study clearly signifies the importance of RAMPS being able to achieve higher R0 resection rate as well as less complications which results in better surgical and long term clinical outcomes for the patients. With more expertise and surgical training, this novel procedure promises to be a more safer and feasible technique than the conventional pancreatosplenectomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae271.300
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HPB SO69 - Comparison of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with standard pancreatosplenectomy for left sided pancreatic cancer

Hafiz Javaid Iqbal, Prithvirao Sonoo, Talha Azam Tarrar, Amir Khawaja et al.
British journal of surgery
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

HPB SO69 - Comparison of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with standard pancreatosplenectomy for left sided pancreatic cancer

Hafiz Javaid Iqbal, Prithvirao Sonoo, Talha Azam Tarrar, Amir Khawaja, Syed Taimur Karamat
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Long term survival of patients undergoing distal pancreatosplenectomy for left sided pancreatic cancer has not been satisfactory owing to inability to achieve negative resection margins. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) has been designed to achieve better margin resection and better lymph node clearance compared to the standard distal pancreatosplenectomy (SDP) for left sided pancreatic cancer. This results in better oncological outcomes and patient survival rates. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes from RAMPS and SDP. Method Literature search was performed to identify studies published in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library and google search. 13 Studies comparing RAMPS versus standard method of distal pancreatecetomy were included in the final meta-analysis. Revman 5.4 was used to perform the analysis and random effects model was used with results shown on forest plot. A total of 1450 patients were enrolled in the meta analysis with 685 in RAMPS and 765 patients in SDP group. R0 resection rate, recurrence rate, better overall survival and number of harvested lymph nodes were taken as primary outcomes. Results RAMPS was associated with better overall survival than SDP (HR-0.62, 95% CI - 0.38-0.91, p=0.03). The recurrence rate (OR-0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.97, p=0.04) was significantly less. R0 resection rate was higher in RAMPS but did not reach statistical significance (OR-1.47 CI0.93-2.3, p=0.10). Complications notably pancreatic fistula Showed favourable results in RAMPS along with other variables such as hospital stay, operative stay and blood loss but didn’t reach statistical Significance. Conclusion This study clearly signifies the importance of RAMPS being able to achieve higher R0 resection rate as well as less complications which results in better surgical and long term clinical outcomes for the patients. With more expertise and surgical training, this novel procedure promises to be a more safer and feasible technique than the conventional pancreatosplenectomy.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_9)
Lincoln County Hospital (GB), Queen's Medical Centre (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.