BN SO19 - Evaluating Wrap Pressure Augmentation Ratio and Physiological Transit Time for Post-Fundoplication Dysphagia

Abstract Background Post-fundoplication dysphagia affects many patients that can often lead to significant weight loss and reduced quality of life, and prompt some to seek surgical reversal. Current diagnostic methods may not fully explain the dysphagia which may necessitate repeat oesophageal physiology testing. This study retrospectively evaluates two novel markers, Wrap Pressure Augmentation Ratio (WPAR) and Physiological Transit Time (PTT), to better understand and manage the post-fundoplication dysphagia. Method The study retrospectively reviewed 54 post-Nissen’s fundoplication patients from January 2020 to May 2024. WPAR was calculated as the ratio of the augmented wrap basal pressure to the median integrated relaxation pressure found during high-resolution manometry following the Chicago Classification guideline [1]. PTT was measured from controlled measurements of antegrade bolus movement [2] during multichannel impedance-pH studies [3]. Patients completed HODQ forms to assess dysphagia [4]. Optimal WPAR and PTT thresholds were determined using Youden’s J index from receiver operating characteristic curves. This study was ethically approved (REC 18/NW/0120, IRAS 333800). Results Out of 54 cases (female=28:26, mean age 50.6), 75.9% reported clinical dysphagia post-fundoplication. Significant correlations were found with WPAR (<1.49, p=0.017) and PTT (>0.83 minutes, p=0.028)(see Table 1). These findings suggest WPAR and PTT as effective markers for post-fundoplication dysphagia. The analysis revealed a moderate correlation between WPAR and PTT (r =-0.45, p<0.05), suggesting that lower WPAR values tend to be associated with longer PTT. SensitivityPositive Predictive Valueχ2p-valueWPAR <1.490.610.895.680.017PTT >0.83 minutes0.780.844.820.028 Table 1 showing predictive DR and PTT values for clinical dysphasia post fundoplication. Conclusion This pilot study identifies PAR and PTT as promising physiological markers for diagnosing post-fundoplication dysphagia. The moderate correlation between PAR and PTT suggests a potential link, indicating that lower pressure augmentation might be associated with slower oesophageal transit times. These markers could enhance management strategies for affected patients. However, the study's small sample size and lack of a control group limit generalizability. Larger, controlled studies are necessary to validate these findings and further explore the relationship between PAR and PTT. References [1] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nmo.14058 [2] https://gut.bmj.com/content/70/Suppl_1/A215.1 [3] https://gut.bmj.com/content/68/10/1731 [4] https://www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085(09)62439-2/fulltext

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae271.190
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BN SO19 - Evaluating Wrap Pressure Augmentation Ratio and Physiological Transit Time for Post-Fundoplication Dysphagia

Jafar Jafari, James Gossage, Sebastian S. Zeki, Terence Z. Wong et al.
British journal of surgery
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

BN SO19 - Evaluating Wrap Pressure Augmentation Ratio and Physiological Transit Time for Post-Fundoplication Dysphagia

Jafar Jafari, James Gossage, Sebastian S. Zeki, Terence Z. Wong, Ismail Miah
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Post-fundoplication dysphagia affects many patients that can often lead to significant weight loss and reduced quality of life, and prompt some to seek surgical reversal. Current diagnostic methods may not fully explain the dysphagia which may necessitate repeat oesophageal physiology testing. This study retrospectively evaluates two novel markers, Wrap Pressure Augmentation Ratio (WPAR) and Physiological Transit Time (PTT), to better understand and manage the post-fundoplication dysphagia. Method The study retrospectively reviewed 54 post-Nissen’s fundoplication patients from January 2020 to May 2024. WPAR was calculated as the ratio of the augmented wrap basal pressure to the median integrated relaxation pressure found during high-resolution manometry following the Chicago Classification guideline [1]. PTT was measured from controlled measurements of antegrade bolus movement [2] during multichannel impedance-pH studies [3]. Patients completed HODQ forms to assess dysphagia [4]. Optimal WPAR and PTT thresholds were determined using Youden’s J index from receiver operating characteristic curves. This study was ethically approved (REC 18/NW/0120, IRAS 333800). Results Out of 54 cases (female=28:26, mean age 50.6), 75.9% reported clinical dysphagia post-fundoplication. Significant correlations were found with WPAR (<1.49, p=0.017) and PTT (>0.83 minutes, p=0.028)(see Table 1). These findings suggest WPAR and PTT as effective markers for post-fundoplication dysphagia. The analysis revealed a moderate correlation between WPAR and PTT (r =-0.45, p<0.05), suggesting that lower WPAR values tend to be associated with longer PTT. SensitivityPositive Predictive Valueχ2p-valueWPAR <1.490.610.895.680.017PTT >0.83 minutes0.780.844.820.028 Table 1 showing predictive DR and PTT values for clinical dysphasia post fundoplication. Conclusion This pilot study identifies PAR and PTT as promising physiological markers for diagnosing post-fundoplication dysphagia. The moderate correlation between PAR and PTT suggests a potential link, indicating that lower pressure augmentation might be associated with slower oesophageal transit times. These markers could enhance management strategies for affected patients. However, the study's small sample size and lack of a control group limit generalizability. Larger, controlled studies are necessary to validate these findings and further explore the relationship between PAR and PTT. References [1] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nmo.14058 [2] https://gut.bmj.com/content/70/Suppl_1/A215.1 [3] https://gut.bmj.com/content/68/10/1731 [4] https://www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085(09)62439-2/fulltext

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_9)
King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.