A04 - EGS Evidenced competency in benign biliary surgery amongst UK general surgeons at certification: A JCST/ISCP study

Abstract Background Symptomatic gallstones are the most common reason for evaluation by an Emergency General Surgery (EGS) service, with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) being performed by most general surgeons. Previous studies show that most LCs in the United Kingdom (UK) are performed by colorectal surgeons (CR). Emergency cholecystectomy requires advanced skills including intra-operative assessment of the bile ducts, and the ability to perform intra-operative cholangiogram (IOC) is part of the procedure-based assessment (PBA) that evidences competency for certificate of completion of training (CCT). This study aims to assess documented evidence of competency in benign biliary surgery amongst general surgeons in the UK. Method PBAs relating to LC and CBD exploration (CBDE) were retrieved for all UK general surgeons who received CCT between 2016 and 2021 from ISCP (702; 285 (41%) colorectal; 212 (30%) Upper GI (UGI)). All eLogbook entries relating to LC +/- IOC +/- CBDE were also retrieved. Subspecialty interest was determined from Part 2 of the FRCS examination. Competence (Level 4) as well as a granular assessment of IOC and CBDE was compared amongst trainees, taking into account their subspecialty interest. Results 11,733 LC and 553 CBDE assessments from 160,570 LC +/- IOC +/- CBDE procedures recorded on eLogbook were retrieved. Knowledge of IOC indication was assessed in 467 (94%) surgeons, but performance was only assessed in 380 (75%) surgeons. Median satisfactory IOC performance assessments was 3 (2-5). UGI were more likely to do this than colorectal (4 (2-7) vs 2 (1-4) P < 0.001). Satisfactory CBDE was achieved by 86 surgeons (12 CR and 74 UGI). 486 surgeons (97% CR; 94% UGI) received Level 4 (independence) despite never achieving satisfactory ability to perform IOC. Conclusion Competency in acute biliary surgery for general surgeons at certification is extensively assessed using PBAs. Cholecystectomy training and assessment in the UK does not seem to include intraoperative bile duct anatomy assessment or treatment of CBD stones. Assumed competency in cholecystectomy by trainers in the UK does not seem to include the need to do this, as 97% of CR and 94% of UGI trainees achieve documented competence without the ability to perform IOC. This may have an impact on EGS service delivery of acute and emergency gallbladder surgery including the ability to deal with difficult cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British journal of surgery
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae271.004
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A04 - EGS Evidenced competency in benign biliary surgery amongst UK general surgeons at certification: A JCST/ISCP study

Ambareen Kausar, Martyn Stott, Iain Targett
British journal of surgery
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

A04 - EGS Evidenced competency in benign biliary surgery amongst UK general surgeons at certification: A JCST/ISCP study

Ambareen Kausar, Martyn Stott, Iain Targett
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Symptomatic gallstones are the most common reason for evaluation by an Emergency General Surgery (EGS) service, with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) being performed by most general surgeons. Previous studies show that most LCs in the United Kingdom (UK) are performed by colorectal surgeons (CR). Emergency cholecystectomy requires advanced skills including intra-operative assessment of the bile ducts, and the ability to perform intra-operative cholangiogram (IOC) is part of the procedure-based assessment (PBA) that evidences competency for certificate of completion of training (CCT). This study aims to assess documented evidence of competency in benign biliary surgery amongst general surgeons in the UK. Method PBAs relating to LC and CBD exploration (CBDE) were retrieved for all UK general surgeons who received CCT between 2016 and 2021 from ISCP (702; 285 (41%) colorectal; 212 (30%) Upper GI (UGI)). All eLogbook entries relating to LC +/- IOC +/- CBDE were also retrieved. Subspecialty interest was determined from Part 2 of the FRCS examination. Competence (Level 4) as well as a granular assessment of IOC and CBDE was compared amongst trainees, taking into account their subspecialty interest. Results 11,733 LC and 553 CBDE assessments from 160,570 LC +/- IOC +/- CBDE procedures recorded on eLogbook were retrieved. Knowledge of IOC indication was assessed in 467 (94%) surgeons, but performance was only assessed in 380 (75%) surgeons. Median satisfactory IOC performance assessments was 3 (2-5). UGI were more likely to do this than colorectal (4 (2-7) vs 2 (1-4) P < 0.001). Satisfactory CBDE was achieved by 86 surgeons (12 CR and 74 UGI). 486 surgeons (97% CR; 94% UGI) received Level 4 (independence) despite never achieving satisfactory ability to perform IOC. Conclusion Competency in acute biliary surgery for general surgeons at certification is extensively assessed using PBAs. Cholecystectomy training and assessment in the UK does not seem to include intraoperative bile duct anatomy assessment or treatment of CBD stones. Assumed competency in cholecystectomy by trainers in the UK does not seem to include the need to do this, as 97% of CR and 94% of UGI trainees achieve documented competence without the ability to perform IOC. This may have an impact on EGS service delivery of acute and emergency gallbladder surgery including the ability to deal with difficult cases.

British journal of surgeryVol. 111(Supplement_9)
Royal College of Surgeons of England (GB), Manchester Royal Infirmary (GB), Health Education North West (GB), Royal Blackburn Teaching Hospital (GB), NHS England
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.