CTNI-28. IN VITRO GLIOMA STEMLIKE CELL-BASED SCREENING TO PREDICT DRUG SENSITIVITY IN RECURRENTGLIOBLASTOMA: A CLINICAL SERIES AND SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Abstract INTRODUCTION There is no standard care for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) after surgery and radiochemotherapy. Lomustine is commonly used in clinical trials, while regorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, has shown a survival benefit in the randomized multicentric REGOMA trial, becoming the standard treatment in several countries, including Italy. However, due to nonnegligible toxicity, early identification of likely responders is crucial for personalized treatment. Various studies have explored putative molecular predictors of response with conflicting results. Glioma stem-like cells (GSCs), the most treatment-resistant subpopulation, are believed to drive GBM recurrence post-chemoradiotherapy. Thus, GSCs might provide valuable insights into the drug sensitivity of recurrent GBM. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2020 and 2022, nine patients enrolled in a prospective study to obtain GSC cultures from tumor tissue obtained at first surgery were treated with regorafenib upon tumor recurrence. Four patients underwent reoperation before starting regorafenib. GSC cultures were exposed to increasing regorafenib doses in vitro to determine sensitivity (IC50). RESULTS The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months, consistent with REGOMA data. Only one patient achieved 6-month PFS (11.1%). GSCs from this patient were the only ones with an IC50 below the plasma range of regorafenib during treatment (IC50 4.6 μM, range 5.2-8.1 μM). Additionally, this patient had not undergone reoperation before starting regorafenib. Systematic literature review showed few but promising studies in which therapy personalization was based on in vitro drug screening. CONCLUSIONS Although preliminary, these findings suggest a potential paradigm shift in personalized treatment for recurrent GBM, utilizing a GSC-based approach rather than molecular profiling. Further evaluation of GSCs from recurrent tumor tissue is necessary to determine their utility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noae165.0395
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CTNI-28. IN VITRO GLIOMA STEMLIKE CELL-BASED SCREENING TO PREDICT DRUG SENSITIVITY IN RECURRENTGLIOBLASTOMA: A CLINICAL SERIES AND SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Ciro Mazzarella, Martina Offi, Lucia Ricci‐Vitiani, Mariachiara Buccarelli et al.
Neuro-Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

CTNI-28. IN VITRO GLIOMA STEMLIKE CELL-BASED SCREENING TO PREDICT DRUG SENSITIVITY IN RECURRENTGLIOBLASTOMA: A CLINICAL SERIES AND SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Ciro Mazzarella, Martina Offi, Lucia Ricci‐Vitiani, Mariachiara Buccarelli, Alessandro Olivi, Francesco Doglietto, Giuliano Di Monaco, Roberto Pallini, Maria Laura Falchetti, Giovanni Maria Ceccarelli, Silvia Chiesa, Giuseppe Maria Della Pepa, Quintino Giorgio D’Alessandris, Rina Di Bonaventura, Francesco Beghella Bartoli, Seema Shetty, Liverana Lauretti, Silvia Silvia
article en

Abstract

Abstract INTRODUCTION There is no standard care for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) after surgery and radiochemotherapy. Lomustine is commonly used in clinical trials, while regorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, has shown a survival benefit in the randomized multicentric REGOMA trial, becoming the standard treatment in several countries, including Italy. However, due to nonnegligible toxicity, early identification of likely responders is crucial for personalized treatment. Various studies have explored putative molecular predictors of response with conflicting results. Glioma stem-like cells (GSCs), the most treatment-resistant subpopulation, are believed to drive GBM recurrence post-chemoradiotherapy. Thus, GSCs might provide valuable insights into the drug sensitivity of recurrent GBM. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2020 and 2022, nine patients enrolled in a prospective study to obtain GSC cultures from tumor tissue obtained at first surgery were treated with regorafenib upon tumor recurrence. Four patients underwent reoperation before starting regorafenib. GSC cultures were exposed to increasing regorafenib doses in vitro to determine sensitivity (IC50). RESULTS The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months, consistent with REGOMA data. Only one patient achieved 6-month PFS (11.1%). GSCs from this patient were the only ones with an IC50 below the plasma range of regorafenib during treatment (IC50 4.6 μM, range 5.2-8.1 μM). Additionally, this patient had not undergone reoperation before starting regorafenib. Systematic literature review showed few but promising studies in which therapy personalization was based on in vitro drug screening. CONCLUSIONS Although preliminary, these findings suggest a potential paradigm shift in personalized treatment for recurrent GBM, utilizing a GSC-based approach rather than molecular profiling. Further evaluation of GSCs from recurrent tumor tissue is necessary to determine their utility.

Neuro-OncologyVol. 26(Supplement_8)
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US), Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science (CN), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.