Prevalence and Center Variability of Catheter-Based Hemodialysis in Vienna: Insights from the Vienna ACTS NOW Study

<b>Objectives</b>: The choice of vascular access continues to be a critical component in the management of hemodialysis patients. Despite the international consensus favoring arteriovenous (AV) fistulas, the use of central venous catheters (CVCs) remains prevalent, with substantial variations across countries and even among dialysis centers within the same region. This study examines the prevalence of CVC use among chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients in Vienna, Austria, and explores inter-center differences. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on patients receiving CVC-based CHD in Vienna as of March 2023. Patient demographics, comorbidities and their hemodialysis history were collected. Additionally, a subset of the population underwent vascular access (VA) mapping to assess eligibility for AV fistula (AVF) or AV graft (AVG) creation. <b>Results</b>: A total of 335 patients received CVC-based hemodialysis, equaling a CVC proportion of 42.5%. 191 (57.0%) patients on CVC-based CHD gave their consent to record their clinical data and vascular access history. Of the 191 included patients, 61 gave their consent to receive VA mapping. Of the 61 patients who received VA mapping, 60 (98.4%) were eligible for an upper extremity AVF or AVG. There was no significant difference regarding patient demographics, dialysis vintage, history of previous AVF or AVG or Charlson Comorbidity Index between the mapping and non-mapping group. The odds ratio of having a CVC in the absence of in-house vascular surgery was 3.41 (95% CI: 2.31-5.02, <i>p</i>-value < 0.001) compared to patients with in-house vascular surgery. <b>Conclusions</b>: The majority of patients that consented to ultrasound VA mapping fulfilled vascular requirements for AVF or AVG creation. Our study highlights the potential to decrease the prevalence of CVC-based CHD in Vienna that could translate to a reduction in CVC-associated complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226733
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence and Center Variability of Catheter-Based Hemodialysis in Vienna: Insights from the Vienna ACTS NOW Study

Sara H. Ksiazek, Fadi Taher, Afshin Assadian, Maria-Elisabeth Leinweber et al.
5 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
3.72
article

Prevalence and Center Variability of Catheter-Based Hemodialysis in Vienna: Insights from the Vienna ACTS NOW Study

Sara H. Ksiazek, Fadi Taher, Afshin Assadian, Maria-Elisabeth Leinweber, Marcus D. Säemann, Markus Plimon, Johannes Werzowa, G Hofmann
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b>Objectives</b>: The choice of vascular access continues to be a critical component in the management of hemodialysis patients. Despite the international consensus favoring arteriovenous (AV) fistulas, the use of central venous catheters (CVCs) remains prevalent, with substantial variations across countries and even among dialysis centers within the same region. This study examines the prevalence of CVC use among chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients in Vienna, Austria, and explores inter-center differences. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on patients receiving CVC-based CHD in Vienna as of March 2023. Patient demographics, comorbidities and their hemodialysis history were collected. Additionally, a subset of the population underwent vascular access (VA) mapping to assess eligibility for AV fistula (AVF) or AV graft (AVG) creation. <b>Results</b>: A total of 335 patients received CVC-based hemodialysis, equaling a CVC proportion of 42.5%. 191 (57.0%) patients on CVC-based CHD gave their consent to record their clinical data and vascular access history. Of the 191 included patients, 61 gave their consent to receive VA mapping. Of the 61 patients who received VA mapping, 60 (98.4%) were eligible for an upper extremity AVF or AVG. There was no significant difference regarding patient demographics, dialysis vintage, history of previous AVF or AVG or Charlson Comorbidity Index between the mapping and non-mapping group. The odds ratio of having a CVC in the absence of in-house vascular surgery was 3.41 (95% CI: 2.31-5.02, <i>p</i>-value < 0.001) compared to patients with in-house vascular surgery. <b>Conclusions</b>: The majority of patients that consented to ultrasound VA mapping fulfilled vascular requirements for AVF or AVG creation. Our study highlights the potential to decrease the prevalence of CVC-based CHD in Vienna that could translate to a reduction in CVC-associated complications.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(22)
Hanusch Hospital (AT)
Karl Landsteiner Privatuniversität für Gesundheitswissenschaften
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
3.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.