Predicting COD and TN in A2O+AO Process Considering Influent and Reactor Variability: A Dynamic Ensemble Model Approach

The prediction of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total nitrogen (TN) in integrated anaerobic–anoxic–oxic (A2O) and anoxic–oxic (AO) processes (i.e., A2O+AO process) was achieved using a dynamic ensemble model that reflects the dynamics of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). This model effectively captures the variability in the influent characteristics and fluctuations within each reactor of the A2O+AO process. By employing a time-lag approach based on the hydraulic retention time (HRT), artificial intelligence (AI) selects suitable input (i.e., pH, temperature, total dissolved solid (TDS), NH3-N, and NO3-N) and output (COD and TN) data pairs for training, minimizing the error between predicted and observed values. Data collected over two years from the actual A2O+AO process were utilized. The ensemble model adopted machine learning-based XGBoost for COD and TN predictions. The dynamic ensemble model outperformed the static ensemble model, with the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for the COD ranging from 9.5% to 15.2%, compared to the static ensemble model’s range of 11.4% to 16.9%. For the TN, the dynamic model’s errors ranged from 9.4% to 15.5%, while the static model showed lower errors in specific reactors, particularly in the anoxic and oxic stages due to their stable characteristics. These results indicate that the dynamic ensemble model is suitable for predicting water quality in WWTPs, especially as variability may increase due to external environmental factors in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w16223212
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting COD and TN in A2O+AO Process Considering Influent and Reactor Variability: A Dynamic Ensemble Model Approach

Xianghao Ren, Sung-Gwan Park, Kyu‐Jung Chae, Yingjie Guo et al.
2 citations
Water
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
0.40
article

Predicting COD and TN in A2O+AO Process Considering Influent and Reactor Variability: A Dynamic Ensemble Model Approach

Xianghao Ren, Sung-Gwan Park, Kyu‐Jung Chae, Yingjie Guo, Moon-Hyun Hwang, Eui-Jong Lee, Jiyeon Kim, Jung Min Lee, Guili Zheng, Sangyoup Lee, Jeong-Hyun Park
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The prediction of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total nitrogen (TN) in integrated anaerobic–anoxic–oxic (A2O) and anoxic–oxic (AO) processes (i.e., A2O+AO process) was achieved using a dynamic ensemble model that reflects the dynamics of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). This model effectively captures the variability in the influent characteristics and fluctuations within each reactor of the A2O+AO process. By employing a time-lag approach based on the hydraulic retention time (HRT), artificial intelligence (AI) selects suitable input (i.e., pH, temperature, total dissolved solid (TDS), NH3-N, and NO3-N) and output (COD and TN) data pairs for training, minimizing the error between predicted and observed values. Data collected over two years from the actual A2O+AO process were utilized. The ensemble model adopted machine learning-based XGBoost for COD and TN predictions. The dynamic ensemble model outperformed the static ensemble model, with the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) for the COD ranging from 9.5% to 15.2%, compared to the static ensemble model’s range of 11.4% to 16.9%. For the TN, the dynamic model’s errors ranged from 9.4% to 15.5%, while the static model showed lower errors in specific reactors, particularly in the anoxic and oxic stages due to their stable characteristics. These results indicate that the dynamic ensemble model is suitable for predicting water quality in WWTPs, especially as variability may increase due to external environmental factors in the future.

WaterVol. 16(22)
Seoul National University (KR), Korea University (KR), Korea Maritime and Ocean University (KR), Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (CN), Daegu University (KR)
Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology promotion
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.