Evolving Educational Testing to Meet Students’ Needs: Design‐in‐Real‐Time Assessment

Abstract The goal in personalized assessment is to best fit the needs of each individual test taker, given the assessment purposes. Design‐In‐Real‐Time (DIRTy) assessment reflects the progressive evolution in testing from a single test, to an adaptive test, to an adaptive assessment system . In this article, we lay the foundation for DIRTy assessment and illustrate how it meets the complex needs of each individual learner. The assessment framework incorporates culturally responsive assessment principles, thus making it innovative with respect to both technology and equity. Key aspects are (a) assessment building blocks called “assessment task modules” (ATMs) linked to multiple content standards and skill domains, (b) gathering information on test takers’ characteristics and preferences and using this information to improve their testing experience, and (c) selecting, modifying, and compiling ATMs to create a personalized test that best meets the needs of the testing purpose and individual test taker.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Measurement Issues and Practice
Published
2024-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12653
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolving Educational Testing to Meet Students’ Needs: Design‐in‐Real‐Time Assessment

Javier Suárez‐Álvarez, Stephen G. Sireci, María Elena Oliveri, April L. Zenisky
3 citations
Educational Measurement Issues and Practice
Student Assessment and Feedback
6.29
article

Evolving Educational Testing to Meet Students’ Needs: Design‐in‐Real‐Time Assessment

Javier Suárez‐Álvarez, Stephen G. Sireci, María Elena Oliveri, April L. Zenisky
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The goal in personalized assessment is to best fit the needs of each individual test taker, given the assessment purposes. Design‐In‐Real‐Time (DIRTy) assessment reflects the progressive evolution in testing from a single test, to an adaptive test, to an adaptive assessment system . In this article, we lay the foundation for DIRTy assessment and illustrate how it meets the complex needs of each individual learner. The assessment framework incorporates culturally responsive assessment principles, thus making it innovative with respect to both technology and equity. Key aspects are (a) assessment building blocks called “assessment task modules” (ATMs) linked to multiple content standards and skill domains, (b) gathering information on test takers’ characteristics and preferences and using this information to improve their testing experience, and (c) selecting, modifying, and compiling ATMs to create a personalized test that best meets the needs of the testing purpose and individual test taker.

Educational Measurement Issues and PracticeVol. 43(4)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Center for Assessment (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Student Assessment and Feedback
6.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.