Leveraging or Overcoming Distance? Global Strategy and Structure of Professional Services Firms

In this study, geographic distance is an instructional logic that influences the international strategy and structure of professional service firms (PSFs). By drawing on three governance modes—global value chains, virtual teams, and ecosystems—we identify eight governance structures in use by PSFs, resulting from reliance on one of two distance logics: distance-as-enabler and distance-as-barrier. When the logic of distance-as-enabler is prioritized, PSFs choose a structure that is more unified at the global level. When the logic of distance-as-barrier is upheld, PSFs give greater autonomy to local units or establish loosely connected regionally autonomous partnerships. By highlighting the co-evolution between professional governance and professional practice we further show that greater distance necessitates professional work to be more codified and modularized, while proximity preserves professional work's bespoke nature. We apply this framework to demonstrate how external environmental factors trigger firms to shift from one specific governance-practice form to another.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
Published
2024-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863241294147
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging or Overcoming Distance? Global Strategy and Structure of Professional Services Firms

Jeffrey Peo, Mari Sako
1 citations
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
Innovation and Knowledge Management
0.55
article

Leveraging or Overcoming Distance? Global Strategy and Structure of Professional Services Firms

Jeffrey Peo, Mari Sako
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this study, geographic distance is an instructional logic that influences the international strategy and structure of professional service firms (PSFs). By drawing on three governance modes—global value chains, virtual teams, and ecosystems—we identify eight governance structures in use by PSFs, resulting from reliance on one of two distance logics: distance-as-enabler and distance-as-barrier. When the logic of distance-as-enabler is prioritized, PSFs choose a structure that is more unified at the global level. When the logic of distance-as-barrier is upheld, PSFs give greater autonomy to local units or establish loosely connected regionally autonomous partnerships. By highlighting the co-evolution between professional governance and professional practice we further show that greater distance necessitates professional work to be more codified and modularized, while proximity preserves professional work's bespoke nature. We apply this framework to demonstrate how external environmental factors trigger firms to shift from one specific governance-practice form to another.

The Journal of Applied Behavioral ScienceVol. 61(2)
University of Oxford (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.