River restoration effects on dispersal and the development of riparian seed bank: do poor seed banks limit restoration of boreal riparian zones?

In boreal streams, restoration after channelization typically consists of increasing instream geomorphic complexity with no other active restoration measures (e.g. planting) as it mainly targets fish. Unsurprisingly, this restoration fails to restore riparian vegetation within the time frames needed to meet biodiversity goals. To understand the potential role of dispersal and seed banks in the poor restoration results, we compared deposition patterns from a seed release experiment conducted during spring flood and summer low flow conditions to seed bank‐ and vegetation composition. The experiment was conducted across seven boreal streams, each differing in time since restoration (0–22 years). We found that seed deposition increased due to low flow and local flow obstruction, suggesting the importance of instream boulders. Locations where there was a high deposition likelihood in our seed release experiment had higher Shannon diversity compared to locations with a low seed deposition likelihood. Riparian vegetation composition is related to flow obstruction, while seed bank species composition is correlated to spring flood seed deposition. In general, the sampled riparian seed banks contained few seeds and species. We therefore conclude that (1) restoration of hydrogeomorphic complexity (especially instream boulders) can enhance seed deposition with some effects on species composition of the vegetation and seed bank diversity, and (2) the importance of these generally species poor seed banks for the return of species after restoration boreal streams is questionable. Other (active) methods or more time may therefore be needed to meet biodiversity goals within riparian vegetation restoration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2024-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14328
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

River restoration effects on dispersal and the development of riparian seed bank: do poor seed banks limit restoration of boreal riparian zones?

Eliza Maher Hasselquist, Judith M. Sarneel, Laura Brett, Anoek van den Bosch‐Hennink
Restoration Ecology
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
article

River restoration effects on dispersal and the development of riparian seed bank: do poor seed banks limit restoration of boreal riparian zones?

Eliza Maher Hasselquist, Judith M. Sarneel, Laura Brett, Anoek van den Bosch‐Hennink
article en

Abstract

In boreal streams, restoration after channelization typically consists of increasing instream geomorphic complexity with no other active restoration measures (e.g. planting) as it mainly targets fish. Unsurprisingly, this restoration fails to restore riparian vegetation within the time frames needed to meet biodiversity goals. To understand the potential role of dispersal and seed banks in the poor restoration results, we compared deposition patterns from a seed release experiment conducted during spring flood and summer low flow conditions to seed bank‐ and vegetation composition. The experiment was conducted across seven boreal streams, each differing in time since restoration (0–22 years). We found that seed deposition increased due to low flow and local flow obstruction, suggesting the importance of instream boulders. Locations where there was a high deposition likelihood in our seed release experiment had higher Shannon diversity compared to locations with a low seed deposition likelihood. Riparian vegetation composition is related to flow obstruction, while seed bank species composition is correlated to spring flood seed deposition. In general, the sampled riparian seed banks contained few seeds and species. We therefore conclude that (1) restoration of hydrogeomorphic complexity (especially instream boulders) can enhance seed deposition with some effects on species composition of the vegetation and seed bank diversity, and (2) the importance of these generally species poor seed banks for the return of species after restoration boreal streams is questionable. Other (active) methods or more time may therefore be needed to meet biodiversity goals within riparian vegetation restoration.

Restoration EcologyVol. 33(1)
Utrecht University (NL), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Umeå University (SE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Vetenskapsrådet
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.