280 Characters of Contention: Analyzing Partisan Behavior on Twitter During Supreme Court Confirmation Processes

Abstract We analyze a cache of tweets from partisan users concerning the confirmation hearings of Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Using these original data, we investigate how Twitter users with partisan leanings interact with judicial nominations and confirmations. We find that these users tend to exhibit behavior consistent with offline partisan dynamics. Our analysis reveals that Democrats and Republicans express distinct emotional responses based on the alignment of nominees with their respective parties. Additionally, our study highlights the active participation of partisans in promoting politically charged topics throughout the confirmation process, starting from the vacancy stage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law and Courts
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2024.13
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

280 Characters of Contention: Analyzing Partisan Behavior on Twitter During Supreme Court Confirmation Processes

Rachael Houston, Maron W. Sorenson, Amanda Savage
2 citations
Journal of Law and Courts
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
4.46
article

280 Characters of Contention: Analyzing Partisan Behavior on Twitter During Supreme Court Confirmation Processes

Rachael Houston, Maron W. Sorenson, Amanda Savage
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We analyze a cache of tweets from partisan users concerning the confirmation hearings of Justices Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Using these original data, we investigate how Twitter users with partisan leanings interact with judicial nominations and confirmations. We find that these users tend to exhibit behavior consistent with offline partisan dynamics. Our analysis reveals that Democrats and Republicans express distinct emotional responses based on the alignment of nominees with their respective parties. Additionally, our study highlights the active participation of partisans in promoting politically charged topics throughout the confirmation process, starting from the vacancy stage.

Journal of Law and CourtsVol. 13(2)
Texas Christian University (US), Bowdoin College (US), Loyola University Chicago (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
4.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.