Comparative Analysis of Water Applicability Predictions Explained by The LightGBM Model Using SHAP and LIME

Abstract. This article mainly discusses the application of the LightGBM model to predict water potability for a dataset containing multiple water quality features. The focus of the study is to use two popular model interpretability techniques: SHAP and LIME to explain the model's prediction results. The results show that SHAP can globally explain the feature importance of the entire dataset and provide a deep understanding of the features and model behavior, while LIME provides a detailed explanation of a single prediction through local linear approximation, which is easier to interpret and apply. This article also compares the strengths and limitations of SHAP and LIME in explaining the LightGBM models behavior, demonstrating their applicability and explanatory power in different contexts. In addition, this article also explores the actual application scenarios of water quality prediction and analyzes how interpretability improves model transparency and trust in this field. Through these analyses, the article provides practical suggestions on how to choose appropriate model interpretation methods in reality.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Applied and Computational Engineering
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/104/20241154
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Water Applicability Predictions Explained by The LightGBM Model Using SHAP and LIME

Jianhao Zhang
4 citations
Applied and Computational Engineering
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
0.82
article

Comparative Analysis of Water Applicability Predictions Explained by The LightGBM Model Using SHAP and LIME

Jianhao Zhang
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract. This article mainly discusses the application of the LightGBM model to predict water potability for a dataset containing multiple water quality features. The focus of the study is to use two popular model interpretability techniques: SHAP and LIME to explain the model's prediction results. The results show that SHAP can globally explain the feature importance of the entire dataset and provide a deep understanding of the features and model behavior, while LIME provides a detailed explanation of a single prediction through local linear approximation, which is easier to interpret and apply. This article also compares the strengths and limitations of SHAP and LIME in explaining the LightGBM models behavior, demonstrating their applicability and explanatory power in different contexts. In addition, this article also explores the actual application scenarios of water quality prediction and analyzes how interpretability improves model transparency and trust in this field. Through these analyses, the article provides practical suggestions on how to choose appropriate model interpretation methods in reality.

Applied and Computational EngineeringVol. 104(1)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Water Applicability Predictions Explained by The LightGBM Model Using SHAP and LIME — Jianhao Zhang · Applied and Computational Engineering (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS