Comparing elite and citizen attitudes towards the differentiated implementation of EU law: evidence from a large- <i>N</i> survey of citizens, politicians and bureaucrats

Transnational regulatory harmonisation is a key building block of the international legal order. However, little is known about how elite and citizen views of it differ. Using data from a Norwegian survey from 2023 this article finds both citizen-elite and intra-elite gaps in perceptions of legal harmonisation. First, citizens are significantly less likely to support legal harmonisation than bureaucrats. In contrast, the article finds that their views of it are similar to those of all but the most Eurosceptic politicians. Furthermore, while the attitudes of bureaucrats only differ significantly from those of strongly Eurosceptic politicians, bureaucrats with a ministry or legal background hold views of legal harmonisation significantly different from those of other civil servants. Future studies of public and elite opinion of international cooperation must thus theorise more clearly how the elite-citizen gap may vary for different elites, and empirically test how these differences manifest across policy areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
West European Politics
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2024.2421661
Citations
4
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing elite and citizen attitudes towards the differentiated implementation of EU law: evidence from a large- N survey of citizens, politicians and bureaucrats

Martin Moland
4 citations
West European Politics
European Union Policy and Governance
8.92
article

Comparing elite and citizen attitudes towards the differentiated implementation of EU law: evidence from a large- N survey of citizens, politicians and bureaucrats

Martin Moland
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Transnational regulatory harmonisation is a key building block of the international legal order. However, little is known about how elite and citizen views of it differ. Using data from a Norwegian survey from 2023 this article finds both citizen-elite and intra-elite gaps in perceptions of legal harmonisation. First, citizens are significantly less likely to support legal harmonisation than bureaucrats. In contrast, the article finds that their views of it are similar to those of all but the most Eurosceptic politicians. Furthermore, while the attitudes of bureaucrats only differ significantly from those of strongly Eurosceptic politicians, bureaucrats with a ministry or legal background hold views of legal harmonisation significantly different from those of other civil servants. Future studies of public and elite opinion of international cooperation must thus theorise more clearly how the elite-citizen gap may vary for different elites, and empirically test how these differences manifest across policy areas.

West European PoliticsVol. 49(1)
University of Oslo (NO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
European Union Policy and Governance
8.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing elite and citizen attitudes towards the differentiated implementation of EU law: evidence from a large- <i>N</i> survey of citizens, politicians and bureaucrats — Martin Moland · West European Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS