Co-present mobile phone use as an expectancy violation: revisiting ‘phubbing’ in two lab-based experiments

Two lab-based experiments (N = 81 and N = 74) examined effects of co-present mobile phone use (frequently conceptualized as 'phubbing') on how individuals experience social interactions. The first experiment was modeled after the original Expectancy Violation Theory experiment by Burgoon and Le Poire (1993). Results showed that phubbing predicted perceptions of expectancy violation. These perceptions mediated the association between phubbing and several indicators of both impression formation as well as interpersonal attraction. The second experiment showed that more intensive phubbing led to poorer ratings of the confederate's attentiveness, conversation quality, and perceived relationship quality than less intensive phubbing. Together, the two experiments support that phubbing, especially when it is more intensive, can harm relational outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Influence
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2024.2419622
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-present mobile phone use as an expectancy violation: revisiting ‘phubbing’ in two lab-based experiments

Michal Frackowiak, Mariek Vanden Abeele, Marjolijn L. Antheunis
7 citations
Social Influence
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
7.92
article

Co-present mobile phone use as an expectancy violation: revisiting ‘phubbing’ in two lab-based experiments

Michal Frackowiak, Mariek Vanden Abeele, Marjolijn L. Antheunis
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Two lab-based experiments (N = 81 and N = 74) examined effects of co-present mobile phone use (frequently conceptualized as 'phubbing') on how individuals experience social interactions. The first experiment was modeled after the original Expectancy Violation Theory experiment by Burgoon and Le Poire (1993). Results showed that phubbing predicted perceptions of expectancy violation. These perceptions mediated the association between phubbing and several indicators of both impression formation as well as interpersonal attraction. The second experiment showed that more intensive phubbing led to poorer ratings of the confederate's attentiveness, conversation quality, and perceived relationship quality than less intensive phubbing. Together, the two experiments support that phubbing, especially when it is more intensive, can harm relational outcomes.

Social InfluenceVol. 19(1)
Tilburg University (NL), Ghent University (BE), University of Lausanne (CH)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
7.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.