Predicting accuracy of spherical equivalent after cataract surgery using the online Zcalc calculator for toric IOLs

Compare Zcalc with other formulas on spherical equivalent prediction errors (PE) and explore the relationship between PE and ocular parameters. Optimize 709 IOL power calculation. 114 eyes with age-related cataract and preoperative regular corneal astigmatism of more than 1.5D were included. They underwent cataract surgery followed by implantation of a toric intraocular lens (Zeiss Torbi 709 M) calculated by Zcalc formula. The prediction errors of spherical equivalent (SE) were analysed 3 months post-surgery. The refractive prediction errors of Zcalc, Barrett Universal II, Kane, and K6 formulas were 0.07 ± 0.63D, - 0.36 ± 0.65D, - 0.41 ± 0.67D, and - 0.31 ± 0.66D, respectively. Statistically significant difference were observed between Zcalc and other formulas. The Zcalc was prone to positive deviation, Barrett Universal II, Kane and K6 were prone to negative deviation. When the axial length is greater than 29.0 mm, the prediction errors of Kane is higher, and prone to negative deviation. Prediction errors of Zcalc are small in all eyes and prone to positive deviation. For more accurate prediction, we recommend Barrett Universal II formula for 709 IOL power calculation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78667-x
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting accuracy of spherical equivalent after cataract surgery using the online Zcalc calculator for toric IOLs

Junjie Yang, Ling Jin, Xuan Yu, Yukan Huang et al.
Scientific Reports
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Predicting accuracy of spherical equivalent after cataract surgery using the online Zcalc calculator for toric IOLs

Junjie Yang, Ling Jin, Xuan Yu, Yukan Huang, Mei‐Chin Wen, Yamin Mao
article en

Abstract

Compare Zcalc with other formulas on spherical equivalent prediction errors (PE) and explore the relationship between PE and ocular parameters. Optimize 709 IOL power calculation. 114 eyes with age-related cataract and preoperative regular corneal astigmatism of more than 1.5D were included. They underwent cataract surgery followed by implantation of a toric intraocular lens (Zeiss Torbi 709 M) calculated by Zcalc formula. The prediction errors of spherical equivalent (SE) were analysed 3 months post-surgery. The refractive prediction errors of Zcalc, Barrett Universal II, Kane, and K6 formulas were 0.07 ± 0.63D, - 0.36 ± 0.65D, - 0.41 ± 0.67D, and - 0.31 ± 0.66D, respectively. Statistically significant difference were observed between Zcalc and other formulas. The Zcalc was prone to positive deviation, Barrett Universal II, Kane and K6 were prone to negative deviation. When the axial length is greater than 29.0 mm, the prediction errors of Kane is higher, and prone to negative deviation. Prediction errors of Zcalc are small in all eyes and prone to positive deviation. For more accurate prediction, we recommend Barrett Universal II formula for 709 IOL power calculation.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Union Hospital (HK), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.