Students’ perceptions of ‘AI-giarism’: investigating changes in understandings of academic misconduct

Abstract This novel study explores AI-giarism , an emergent form of academic dishonesty involving AI and plagiarism, within the higher education context. The objective of this study is to investigate students’ perception of adopting generative AI for research and study purposes, and their understanding of traditional plagiarism and their perception of AI-plagiarism. A survey, undertaken by 393 undergraduate and postgraduate students from a variety of disciplines, investigated their perceptions of diverse AI-giarism scenarios. The findings portray a complex landscape of understanding with clear disapproval for direct AI content generation and ambivalent attitudes towards subtler uses of AI. The study introduces a novel instrument to explore conceptualisation of AI-giarism, offering a significant tool for educators and policy-makers. This scale facilitates understanding and discussions around AI-related academic misconduct, contributing to pedagogical design and assessment in an era of AI integration. Moreover, it challenges traditional definitions of academic misconduct, emphasising the need to adapt in response to evolving AI technology. The study provides pivotal insights for academics and policy-makers concerning the integration of AI technology in education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13151-7
Citations
67
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students’ perceptions of ‘AI-giarism’: investigating changes in understandings of academic misconduct

Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan
67 citations
Education and Information Technologies
Academic integrity and plagiarism
35.24
article

Students’ perceptions of ‘AI-giarism’: investigating changes in understandings of academic misconduct

Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan
article en
67 citations

Abstract

Abstract This novel study explores AI-giarism , an emergent form of academic dishonesty involving AI and plagiarism, within the higher education context. The objective of this study is to investigate students’ perception of adopting generative AI for research and study purposes, and their understanding of traditional plagiarism and their perception of AI-plagiarism. A survey, undertaken by 393 undergraduate and postgraduate students from a variety of disciplines, investigated their perceptions of diverse AI-giarism scenarios. The findings portray a complex landscape of understanding with clear disapproval for direct AI content generation and ambivalent attitudes towards subtler uses of AI. The study introduces a novel instrument to explore conceptualisation of AI-giarism, offering a significant tool for educators and policy-makers. This scale facilitates understanding and discussions around AI-related academic misconduct, contributing to pedagogical design and assessment in an era of AI integration. Moreover, it challenges traditional definitions of academic misconduct, emphasising the need to adapt in response to evolving AI technology. The study provides pivotal insights for academics and policy-makers concerning the integration of AI technology in education.

Education and Information TechnologiesVol. 30(6)
University of Hong Kong (HK)
University Grants Committee, University Research Committee, University of Hong Kong
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
35.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.