Diagnosis and Intervention Strategies to Address Neurodevelopmental and Psychosocial Challenges in School‐Aged Children With Congenital Heart Disease

n 2012, the American Heart Association (AHA) published the first Scientific Statement addressing the evaluation and management of neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease (CHD), which was approved by the American Academy of Pediatrics. 1 It found that children with CHD are at increased risk for neurodevelopmental disorders and disabilities.A management algorithm was devised that stratified children with CHD on the basis of established risk factors, such as genetic syndrome and/or predisposition, fetal and perinatal factors, brain volumes, and surgical and perioperative factors, although all together these risk factors explain <50% of the variation in neurodevelopmental outcomes. 2Subsequent touchpoints for surveillance, evaluation, and management were recommended, and neurodevelopmental evaluation and reevaluation were characterized as essential steps to obtain appropriate interventions and optimize overall development for children with CHD.It also identified that further research is needed to refine high-risk criteria, study the effectiveness of interventions, and identify funding and reimbursement mechanisms to support the provision of neurodevelopmental evaluations and interventions.In 2018, the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative (CNOC), an international organization comprising multidisciplinary professionals working to improve neurodevelopmental and psychosocial outcomes for individuals with CHD, 3 convened working groups with the support of an R13 grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.Goals included to better delineate the current understanding of neurodevelopmental and psychosocial care of children with CHD and propose future directions for research.One working group set out to identify knowledge gaps with respect to the neurodevelopmental and psychosocial outcomes of patients with CHD. 4 It suggested that future investigations need to shift towards improving methods, measurement, and analyses of outcomes in specific CHD populations as well as identification of clinically meaningful outcomes for key stakeholders.Another working group provided an overview of the current neurodevelopmental and psychosocial intervention research findings and recommended

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.124.035985
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnosis and Intervention Strategies to Address Neurodevelopmental and Psychosocial Challenges in School‐Aged Children With Congenital Heart Disease

Laurel Bear, Kelly R. Wolfe, Cheryl L. Brosig
4 citations
Journal of the American Heart Association
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
1.55
article

Diagnosis and Intervention Strategies to Address Neurodevelopmental and Psychosocial Challenges in School‐Aged Children With Congenital Heart Disease

Laurel Bear, Kelly R. Wolfe, Cheryl L. Brosig
article en
4 citations

Abstract

n 2012, the American Heart Association (AHA) published the first Scientific Statement addressing the evaluation and management of neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart disease (CHD), which was approved by the American Academy of Pediatrics. 1 It found that children with CHD are at increased risk for neurodevelopmental disorders and disabilities.A management algorithm was devised that stratified children with CHD on the basis of established risk factors, such as genetic syndrome and/or predisposition, fetal and perinatal factors, brain volumes, and surgical and perioperative factors, although all together these risk factors explain <50% of the variation in neurodevelopmental outcomes. 2Subsequent touchpoints for surveillance, evaluation, and management were recommended, and neurodevelopmental evaluation and reevaluation were characterized as essential steps to obtain appropriate interventions and optimize overall development for children with CHD.It also identified that further research is needed to refine high-risk criteria, study the effectiveness of interventions, and identify funding and reimbursement mechanisms to support the provision of neurodevelopmental evaluations and interventions.In 2018, the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative (CNOC), an international organization comprising multidisciplinary professionals working to improve neurodevelopmental and psychosocial outcomes for individuals with CHD, 3 convened working groups with the support of an R13 grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.Goals included to better delineate the current understanding of neurodevelopmental and psychosocial care of children with CHD and propose future directions for research.One working group set out to identify knowledge gaps with respect to the neurodevelopmental and psychosocial outcomes of patients with CHD. 4 It suggested that future investigations need to shift towards improving methods, measurement, and analyses of outcomes in specific CHD populations as well as identification of clinically meaningful outcomes for key stakeholders.Another working group provided an overview of the current neurodevelopmental and psychosocial intervention research findings and recommended

Journal of the American Heart AssociationVol. 13(24)
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Children's Hospital Colorado (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
1.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.