High-frequency trading, spoofing and conflicting epistemic regimes: Accounting for market abuse in the age of algorithms

In recent years, the use of high-speed algorithms has created new challenges for the integrity and stability of financial markets. One particular abusive behaviour, known as ‘spoofing’, has become a significant concern for regulators and market participants. Drawing on ethnographic materials, we examine the strategies behind manipulative trading practices from the perspective of market operators using algorithms. We show how spoofing is carried out in practice and discuss how the traders involved justify their actions. Our study makes two key contributions. First, we argue that the ‘algorithmic war’ often used to describe contemporary financial markets can be better understood as a conflict between different epistemic regimes. Second, we emphasize the need for regulators to better recognize the role of socio-technical systems in developing market abuse regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economy and Society
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2024.2413809
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-frequency trading, spoofing and conflicting epistemic regimes: Accounting for market abuse in the age of algorithms

Ann-Christina Lange, Marc Lenglet, Robert Seyfert
1 citations
Economy and Society
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
0.54
article

High-frequency trading, spoofing and conflicting epistemic regimes: Accounting for market abuse in the age of algorithms

Ann-Christina Lange, Marc Lenglet, Robert Seyfert
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent years, the use of high-speed algorithms has created new challenges for the integrity and stability of financial markets. One particular abusive behaviour, known as ‘spoofing’, has become a significant concern for regulators and market participants. Drawing on ethnographic materials, we examine the strategies behind manipulative trading practices from the perspective of market operators using algorithms. We show how spoofing is carried out in practice and discuss how the traders involved justify their actions. Our study makes two key contributions. First, we argue that the ‘algorithmic war’ often used to describe contemporary financial markets can be better understood as a conflict between different epistemic regimes. Second, we emphasize the need for regulators to better recognize the role of socio-technical systems in developing market abuse regulations.

Economy and SocietyVol. 53(4)
NEOMA Business School (FR), Copenhagen Business School (DK), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.