Abstract 4140140: Cardiology Follow-Up as a Determinant of LDL-C Management Success in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention

Managing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is crucial for secondary cardiovascular prevention. Despite ACC/AHA recommendations for maintaining LDL below 70 mg/dL, achieving this target remains suboptimal. This study investigates the impact of consistent cardiologist involvement on LDL cholesterol management. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional cohort study within the Steward Healthcare System in Massachusetts, analyzing data from 10,211 patients hospitalized from January 2019 to March 2024. This study offers a detailed snapshot of data across the study period, capturing both recent and long-standing cases identified through ICD codes for conditions like NSTEMI, CAD, STEMI, or CABG, specifically as markers for secondary cardiovascular prevention. We utilized the most recent LDL cholesterol measurements for our analysis and compared the distribution of lipid-lowering medications across groups. Notably, follow-ups with cardiologists outside our network were not tracked, potentially omitting relevant data. Statistical analysis employed the Chi-square test for categorical variables and binary logistic regression to adjust for confounders. Results: showed that patients with regular cardiology visits more often achieved LDL levels below 70 mg/dL (57.45% vs. 46.67%; OR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.42-1.68; P<0.0001). These patients also had lower mean LDL levels (68.72 ± 27.02) compared to those without cardiology follow-up (75.82 ± 30.27; P<0.0001). Higher usage of PCSK9 inhibitors and non-statin medications was noted among the visiting group, with an adjusted OR of 1.43 (95% CI: 1.29-1.59; P<0.0001). Conclusion: Our study shows that cardiologist involvement significantly enhances cholesterol management in CAD patients, as evidenced by a higher proportion achieving optimal LDL levels and more aggressive use of lipid-lowering medications. Despite these benefits, some patients discontinue their follow-ups with cardiologists after coronary events, shifting cholesterol management to primary care providers (PCPs). This transition often results in less aggressive treatment strategies, evidenced by elevated LDL levels in patients lacking recent cardiology care. To sustain effective cholesterol management and stringent LDL targets, long-term follow-up with a cardiologist is crucial. Furthermore, equipping PCPs with the necessary tools and protocols to adopt more aggressive treatment approaches could bridge the care gap when specialist visits are infrequent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4140140
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4140140: Cardiology Follow-Up as a Determinant of LDL-C Management Success in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention

Uyen Lam, Bilawal Nadeem, William Laband, Surik Sedrakyan
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4140140: Cardiology Follow-Up as a Determinant of LDL-C Management Success in Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention

Uyen Lam, Bilawal Nadeem, William Laband, Surik Sedrakyan
article en

Abstract

Managing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol is crucial for secondary cardiovascular prevention. Despite ACC/AHA recommendations for maintaining LDL below 70 mg/dL, achieving this target remains suboptimal. This study investigates the impact of consistent cardiologist involvement on LDL cholesterol management. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional cohort study within the Steward Healthcare System in Massachusetts, analyzing data from 10,211 patients hospitalized from January 2019 to March 2024. This study offers a detailed snapshot of data across the study period, capturing both recent and long-standing cases identified through ICD codes for conditions like NSTEMI, CAD, STEMI, or CABG, specifically as markers for secondary cardiovascular prevention. We utilized the most recent LDL cholesterol measurements for our analysis and compared the distribution of lipid-lowering medications across groups. Notably, follow-ups with cardiologists outside our network were not tracked, potentially omitting relevant data. Statistical analysis employed the Chi-square test for categorical variables and binary logistic regression to adjust for confounders. Results: showed that patients with regular cardiology visits more often achieved LDL levels below 70 mg/dL (57.45% vs. 46.67%; OR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.42-1.68; P<0.0001). These patients also had lower mean LDL levels (68.72 ± 27.02) compared to those without cardiology follow-up (75.82 ± 30.27; P<0.0001). Higher usage of PCSK9 inhibitors and non-statin medications was noted among the visiting group, with an adjusted OR of 1.43 (95% CI: 1.29-1.59; P<0.0001). Conclusion: Our study shows that cardiologist involvement significantly enhances cholesterol management in CAD patients, as evidenced by a higher proportion achieving optimal LDL levels and more aggressive use of lipid-lowering medications. Despite these benefits, some patients discontinue their follow-ups with cardiologists after coronary events, shifting cholesterol management to primary care providers (PCPs). This transition often results in less aggressive treatment strategies, evidenced by elevated LDL levels in patients lacking recent cardiology care. To sustain effective cholesterol management and stringent LDL targets, long-term follow-up with a cardiologist is crucial. Furthermore, equipping PCPs with the necessary tools and protocols to adopt more aggressive treatment approaches could bridge the care gap when specialist visits are infrequent.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
St. Elizabeth's Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.