Abstract 4119535: Aspirin Use and Cardiovascular Disease Incidence in Adults with High Lipoprotein(a): A Multi-Cohort Study

Introduction: There is an active debate about who may benefit from taking aspirin to reduce their incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Some prior cohort studies with small sample size suggest that aspirin use may be associated with a lower incidence of CVD or coronary heart disease (CHD) in adults with Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL but not in those with Lp(a) <50 mg/dL, a hypothesis that needs confirmation. Research question: Does the association of aspirin use with incident CVD or CHD vary by Lp(a) among US adults? Methods: We analyzed publicly available data from adults without CVD at baseline in the ARIC (n=13,085, mean age 54 years), CHS (n=3,956, mean age 72 years), and MESA (n=6,324, mean age 62 years) studies. Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL was defined as high. Participants were followed for incident CVD (myocardial infarction, stroke, or CVD death) and CHD (myocardial infarction or CHD death; median follow-up: ARIC 26 years, CHS 12 years, MESA 14 years). Hazard ratios associated with aspirin use were calculated after propensity score matching (primary analysis) and in all participants using multivariable adjustment (secondary analysis). Mixed-effects models were used to obtain pooled hazard ratios. Results: Aspirin use was 25.1% in ARIC, 29.6% in CHS, and 19.9% in MESA. In MESA, adults taking aspirin were older, had higher blood pressure, and were more likely to have diabetes and a low estimated glomerular filtration rate and to be taking antihypertensive medication and a statin versus those not taking aspirin. These differences were attenuated or not present in ARIC and CHS. The CVD incidence rate per 1,000 person-years (95%CI) was higher in adults with versus without high Lp(a): 16.3 (15.3-17.4) and 12.5 (12.1-13.0), respectively, in ARIC, 35.8 (31.5-40.1) and 32.3 (30.6-34.0) in CHS, and 10.8 (9.1-12.4) and 8.2 (7.5-8.9) in MESA. Aspirin use was not associated with CVD or CHD incidence in adults with or without high Lp(a) in the primary analysis ( Figure ). No association between aspirin use and CVD or CHD incidence was present in the secondary analysis using multivariable adjustment (data not shown). Conclusion: The association of aspirin use with CVD and CHD incidence did not differ by Lp(a) in this multi-cohort study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4119535
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4119535: Aspirin Use and Cardiovascular Disease Incidence in Adults with High Lipoprotein(a): A Multi-Cohort Study

Waqas Malick, Ashley Christenson, Chibuike J Alanaeme, Vera Bittner et al.
Circulation
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Abstract 4119535: Aspirin Use and Cardiovascular Disease Incidence in Adults with High Lipoprotein(a): A Multi-Cohort Study

Waqas Malick, Ashley Christenson, Chibuike J Alanaeme, Vera Bittner, Lisandro D. Colantonio, Robert S. Rosenson, Emily B. Levitan, Lama Ghazi, Medha Dubal, Zhixin Wang
article en

Abstract

Introduction: There is an active debate about who may benefit from taking aspirin to reduce their incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Some prior cohort studies with small sample size suggest that aspirin use may be associated with a lower incidence of CVD or coronary heart disease (CHD) in adults with Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL but not in those with Lp(a) <50 mg/dL, a hypothesis that needs confirmation. Research question: Does the association of aspirin use with incident CVD or CHD vary by Lp(a) among US adults? Methods: We analyzed publicly available data from adults without CVD at baseline in the ARIC (n=13,085, mean age 54 years), CHS (n=3,956, mean age 72 years), and MESA (n=6,324, mean age 62 years) studies. Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL was defined as high. Participants were followed for incident CVD (myocardial infarction, stroke, or CVD death) and CHD (myocardial infarction or CHD death; median follow-up: ARIC 26 years, CHS 12 years, MESA 14 years). Hazard ratios associated with aspirin use were calculated after propensity score matching (primary analysis) and in all participants using multivariable adjustment (secondary analysis). Mixed-effects models were used to obtain pooled hazard ratios. Results: Aspirin use was 25.1% in ARIC, 29.6% in CHS, and 19.9% in MESA. In MESA, adults taking aspirin were older, had higher blood pressure, and were more likely to have diabetes and a low estimated glomerular filtration rate and to be taking antihypertensive medication and a statin versus those not taking aspirin. These differences were attenuated or not present in ARIC and CHS. The CVD incidence rate per 1,000 person-years (95%CI) was higher in adults with versus without high Lp(a): 16.3 (15.3-17.4) and 12.5 (12.1-13.0), respectively, in ARIC, 35.8 (31.5-40.1) and 32.3 (30.6-34.0) in CHS, and 10.8 (9.1-12.4) and 8.2 (7.5-8.9) in MESA. Aspirin use was not associated with CVD or CHD incidence in adults with or without high Lp(a) in the primary analysis ( Figure ). No association between aspirin use and CVD or CHD incidence was present in the secondary analysis using multivariable adjustment (data not shown). Conclusion: The association of aspirin use with CVD and CHD incidence did not differ by Lp(a) in this multi-cohort study.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.