Abstract 4145880: Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) in Hematological Malignancy Patients: Systematic review and Meta-analysis

Background: Patients with hematological malignancies may face increased cardiovascular risks, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the incidence and outcomes of AMI in patients with hematological malignancies compared with the general population. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Random effect models were utilized to calculate Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The inverse variance method with DerSimonian–Laird (DL) of Tau2 was used to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) with CIs. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AMI, while secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, likelihood of undergoing invasive procedures, total hospital costs, bleeding events, and stroke outcomes. Results: Twenty-six articles, including approximately 6.33 million patients with hematological malignancies, were included in the meta-analysis. Hematological malignancies were not associated with an increased incidence of AMI compared with the general population (OR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03; p<0.001). AMI in hematological malignancies was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.71; 95% CI 1.57 to 1.86; p<0.001), bleeding event (OR = 1.30; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.60; p<0.001), and stroke (OR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.42) compared with AMI in the general population. Patients admitted due to AMI in hematologic malignancies also experienced an increased length of stay (SMD = 0.25; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.28; p<0.001) compared with AMI in the general population. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the likelihood of undergoing invasive procedures (OR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.69) or total hospital expenditure (SMD = 0.09; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.19). Conclusion: While hematological malignancies do not appear to increase the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), patients who experience AMI episodes are at higher odds of in-hospital complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4145880
Primary Topic
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4145880: Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) in Hematological Malignancy Patients: Systematic review and Meta-analysis

Hritvik Jain, Ameer Mustafa Farrukh, Aman Goyal, Ashish Kumar et al.
Circulation
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
article

Abstract 4145880: Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) in Hematological Malignancy Patients: Systematic review and Meta-analysis

Hritvik Jain, Ameer Mustafa Farrukh, Aman Goyal, Ashish Kumar, Sawai Singh Rathore, Vanessa Vidaurre Corrales, Sem Josue Nsanh Yao, Zario Wint, Ibrahim Al Shyyab
article en

Abstract

Background: Patients with hematological malignancies may face increased cardiovascular risks, including acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the incidence and outcomes of AMI in patients with hematological malignancies compared with the general population. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Random effect models were utilized to calculate Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The inverse variance method with DerSimonian–Laird (DL) of Tau2 was used to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) with CIs. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The primary endpoint was the incidence of AMI, while secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, likelihood of undergoing invasive procedures, total hospital costs, bleeding events, and stroke outcomes. Results: Twenty-six articles, including approximately 6.33 million patients with hematological malignancies, were included in the meta-analysis. Hematological malignancies were not associated with an increased incidence of AMI compared with the general population (OR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03; p<0.001). AMI in hematological malignancies was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.71; 95% CI 1.57 to 1.86; p<0.001), bleeding event (OR = 1.30; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.60; p<0.001), and stroke (OR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.42) compared with AMI in the general population. Patients admitted due to AMI in hematologic malignancies also experienced an increased length of stay (SMD = 0.25; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.28; p<0.001) compared with AMI in the general population. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the likelihood of undergoing invasive procedures (OR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.69) or total hospital expenditure (SMD = 0.09; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.19). Conclusion: While hematological malignancies do not appear to increase the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), patients who experience AMI episodes are at higher odds of in-hospital complications.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College (IN), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur (IN), Western Reserve Hospital (US), University of Sharjah (AE), Universidad Privada del Valle (BO), Cleveland Clinic Akron General (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.